ArticleBMC medical imaging2015
Automated lesion detection on MRI scans using combined unsupervised and supervised methods.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of novel technology-based interventions for ischemic stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Pooled it
- Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.Academic radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Automatic Tumor Segmentation With a Convolutional Neural Network in Multiparametric MRI: Influence of Distortion Correction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2019Trial
- Diffusion MRI GAN synthesizing fibre orientation distribution data using generative adversarial networks.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Characterization of Ischemic Stroke with MRI Images: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Development and clinical application of a deep learning model to identify acute infarct on magnetic resonance imaging.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Automated Cerebral Infarct Detection on Computed Tomography Images Based on Deep Learning.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Automated Object Detection in Experimental Data Using Combination of Unsupervised and Supervised Methods.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- An anomaly detection approach to identify chronic brain infarcts on MRI.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Deep learning-based detection and segmentation of diffusion abnormalities in acute ischemic stroke.Communications medicine · 2021Article
- Accuracy and practical aspects of semi- and fully automatic segmentation methods for resected brain areas.Neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Automated segmentation of haematoma and perihaematomal oedema in MRI of acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage.Computers in biology and medicine · 2019Article
- Delineation of the ischemic stroke lesion based on watershed and relative fuzzy connectedness in brain MRI.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2018Article
- Semantic representation in the white matter pathway.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Analytic Tools for Post-traumatic Epileptogenesis Biomarker Search in Multimodal Dataset of an Animal Model and Human Patients.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- Medical Imaging Lesion Detection Based on Unified Gravitational Fuzzy Clustering.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate and precise detection of brain lesions on MR images (MRI) is paramount for accurately relating lesion location to impaired behavior. In this paper, we present a novel method to automatically detect brain lesions from a T1-weighted 3D MRI. The proposed method combines the advantages of both unsupervised and supervised methods.
methodsFirst, unsupervised methods perform a unified segmentation normalization to warp images from the native space into a standard space and to generate probability maps for different tissue types, e.g., gray matter, white matter and fluid. This allows us to construct an initial lesion probability map by comparing the normalized MRI to healthy control subjects. Then, we perform non-rigid and reversible atlas-based registration to refine the probability maps of gray matter, white matter, external CSF, ventricle, and lesions. These probability maps are combined with the normalized MRI to construct three types of features, with which we use supervised methods to train three support vector machine (SVM) classifiers for a combined classifier. Finally, the combined classifier is used to accomplish lesion detection.
resultsWe tested this method using T1-weighted MRIs from 60 in-house stroke patients. Using leave-one-out cross validation, the proposed method can achieve an average Dice coefficient of 73.1% when compared to lesion maps hand-delineated by trained neurologists. Furthermore, we tested the proposed method on the T1-weighted MRIs in the MICCAI BRATS 2012 dataset. The proposed method can achieve an average Dice coefficient of 66.5% in comparison to the expert annotated tumor maps provided in MICCAI BRATS 2012 dataset. In addition, on these two test datasets, the proposed method shows competitive performance to three state-of-the-art methods, including Stamatakis et al., Seghier et al., and Sanjuan et al.
conclusionsIn this paper, we introduced a novel automated procedure for lesion detection from T1-weighted MRIs by combining both an unsupervised and a supervised component. In the unsupervised component, we proposed a method to identify lesioned hemisphere to help normalize the patient MRI with lesions and initialize/refine a lesion probability map. In the supervised component, we extracted three different-order statistical features from both the tissue/lesion probability maps obtained from the unsupervised component and the original MRI intensity. Three support vector machine classifiers are then trained for the three features respectively and combined for final voxel-based lesion classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.