Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26518695›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

Network analysis of gene essentiality in functional genomics experiments.

Peng Jiang, Hongfang Wang, Wei Li, Chongzhi Zang, Bo Li, Yinling J Wong, Cliff Meyer, Jun S Liu, Jon C Aster, X Shirley Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Journal of biosciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Systems biology analysis identifiesComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peng JiangDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Hongfang WangDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Wei LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Chongzhi ZangDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Bo LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Yinling J WongDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Cliff MeyerDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jun S LiuDepartment of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, 200092, China.
Jon C AsterDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
X Shirley LiuDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. xsliu@jimmy.harvard.edu.

Funding

Large-Scale In Vivo Functional Characterization of the Human CistromeR01HG008728 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BROWN, MYLES A, LIU, XIAOLE SHIRLEY · 2015 to 2017
$2.2M
Developing Informatics Technologies to Model Cancer Gene RegulationU01CA180980 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI LIU, XIAOLE SHIRLEY · 2013 to 2015
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA180980NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genomic techniques have been developed to study gene essentiality genome-wide, such as CRISPR and shRNA screens. Our analyses of public CRISPR screens suggest protein interaction networks, when integrated with gene expression or histone marks, are highly predictive of gene essentiality. Meanwhile, the quality of CRISPR and shRNA screen results can be significantly enhanced through network neighbor information. We also found network neighbor information to be very informative on prioritizing ChIP-seq target genes and survival indicator genes from tumor profiling. Thus, our study provides a general method for gene essentiality analysis in functional genomic experiments ( http://nest.dfci.harvard.edu ).

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, EssentialCell LineGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsSoftwareSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26518695
PMCPMC4627418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.