Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26518483›Full record

ArticleGenome research2016

MicroRNA evolution, expression, and function during short germband development in Tribolium castaneum.

Maria Ninova, Matthew Ronshaugen, Sam Griffiths-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distinct Regulation of the Expression of Satellite DNAs in the BeetleInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. LncRNANeural regeneration research · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. What Drives Positive Selection in theThe Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016
    Review
  19. The microRNA toolkit of insects.Scientific reports · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria NinovaFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom.
Matthew RonshaugenFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom.
Sam Griffiths-JonesFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011275/1Medical Research Council MR/M008908/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093161/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs are well-established players in the development of multicellular animals. Most of our understanding of microRNA function in arthropod development comes from studies in Drosophila. Despite their advantages as model systems, the long germband embryogenesis of fruit flies is an evolutionary derived state restricted to several holometabolous insect lineages. MicroRNA evolution and expression across development in animals exhibiting the ancestral and more widespread short germband mode of embryogenesis has not been characterized. We sequenced small RNA libraries of oocytes and successive intervals covering the embryonic development of the short germband model organism, Tribolium castaneum. We analyzed the evolution and temporal expression of the microRNA complement and sequenced libraries of total RNA to investigate the relationships with microRNA target expression. We show microRNA maternal loading and sequence-specific 3' end nontemplate oligoadenylation of maternally deposited microRNAs that is conserved between Tribolium and Drosophila. We further uncover large clusters encoding multiple paralogs from several Tribolium-specific microRNA families expressed during a narrow interval of time immediately after the activation of zygotic transcription. These novel microRNAs, together with several early expressed conserved microRNAs, target a significant number of maternally deposited transcripts. Comparison with Drosophila shows that microRNA-mediated maternal transcript targeting is a conserved process in insects, but the number and sequences of microRNAs involved have diverged. The expression of fast-evolving and species-specific microRNAs in the early blastoderm of T. castaneum is consistent with previous findings in Drosophila and shows that the unique permissiveness for microRNA innovation at this stage is a conserved phenomenon.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsDown-RegulationDrosophilaEmbryonic DevelopmentGene LibraryMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNATriboliumMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26518483
PMCPMC4691753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.