Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26518461›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2015

Right hemisphere dominance directly predicts both baseline V1 cortical excitability and the degree of top-down modulation exerted over low-level brain structures.

Q Arshad, S Siddiqui, S Ramachandran, U Goga, A Bonsu, M Patel, R E Roberts, Y Nigmatullina, P Malhotra, A M Bronstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bidirectional Modulation of Numerical Magnitude.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Q ArshadDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
S SiddiquiDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
S RamachandranDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
U GogaDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
A BonsuDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
M PatelDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
R E RobertsDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
Y NigmatullinaDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
P MalhotraDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
A M BronsteinDivision of Brain Sciences, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK. Electronic address: a.bronstein@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J004685/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Right hemisphere dominance for visuo-spatial attention is characteristically observed in most right-handed individuals. This dominance has been attributed to both an anatomically larger right fronto-parietal network and the existence of asymmetric parietal interhemispheric connections. Previously it has been demonstrated that interhemispheric conflict, which induces left hemisphere inhibition, results in the modulation of both (i) the excitability of the early visual cortex (V1) and (ii) the brainstem-mediated vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) via top-down control mechanisms. However to date, it remains unknown whether the degree of an individual's right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial function can influence, (i) the baseline excitability of the visual cortex and (ii) the extent to which the right hemisphere can exert top-down modulation. We directly tested this by correlating line bisection error (or pseudoneglect), taken as a measure of right hemisphere dominance, with both (i) visual cortical excitability measured using phosphene perception elicited via single-pulse occipital trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and (ii) the degree of trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-mediated VOR suppression, following left hemisphere inhibition. We found that those individuals with greater right hemisphere dominance had a less excitable early visual cortex at baseline and demonstrated a greater degree of vestibular nystagmus suppression following left hemisphere cathodal tDCS. To conclude, our results provide the first demonstration that individual differences in right hemisphere dominance can directly predict both the baseline excitability of low-level brain structures and the degree of top-down modulation exerted over them.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleNeural InhibitionPhotic StimulationReflex, Vestibulo-OcularTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual PerceptionYoung Adultline bisectionright hemisphere dominancetop-down modulationvestibular–ocular reflexvisual cortical excitability

Identifiers

PMID26518461
PMCPMC4674775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.