ArticleNeuroscience2015
Right hemisphere dominance directly predicts both baseline V1 cortical excitability and the degree of top-down modulation exerted over low-level brain structures.
Article in Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Induced electric fields in MRI settings and electric vestibular stimulations: same vestibular effects?Experimental brain research · 2024Review
- Electroencephalographic response to transient adaptation of vestibular perception.The Journal of physiology · 2022Article
- Characterizing the evolution of oculomotor and vestibulo-ocular function over time in children and adolescents after a mild traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Interhemispheric co-alteration of brain homotopic regions.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Magnitude Estimates Orchestrate Hierarchal Construction of Context-Dependent Representational Maps for Vestibular Space and Time: Theoretical Implications for Functional Dizziness.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Review
- No handedness effect on spatial orientation or ocular counter-roll during lateral head tilts.Physiological reports · 2019Article
- Abnormal visuo-vestibular interactions in vestibular migraine: a cross sectional study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Vestibulo-cortical hemispheric dominance: The link between anxiety and the vestibular system?The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Article
- Frequency and predictors of post-stroke delirium in PRospective Observational POLIsh Study (PROPOLIS).Journal of neurology · 2018Observational
- An fMRI study of visuo-vestibular interactions following vestibular neuritis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
- Influence of biases in numerical magnitude allocation on human prosocial decision making.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Right-sided dominance of the bilateral vestibular system in the upper brainstem and thalamus.Journal of neurology · 2017Article
- Bidirectional Modulation of Numerical Magnitude.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Right hemisphere dominance for visuo-spatial attention is characteristically observed in most right-handed individuals. This dominance has been attributed to both an anatomically larger right fronto-parietal network and the existence of asymmetric parietal interhemispheric connections. Previously it has been demonstrated that interhemispheric conflict, which induces left hemisphere inhibition, results in the modulation of both (i) the excitability of the early visual cortex (V1) and (ii) the brainstem-mediated vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) via top-down control mechanisms. However to date, it remains unknown whether the degree of an individual's right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial function can influence, (i) the baseline excitability of the visual cortex and (ii) the extent to which the right hemisphere can exert top-down modulation. We directly tested this by correlating line bisection error (or pseudoneglect), taken as a measure of right hemisphere dominance, with both (i) visual cortical excitability measured using phosphene perception elicited via single-pulse occipital trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and (ii) the degree of trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-mediated VOR suppression, following left hemisphere inhibition. We found that those individuals with greater right hemisphere dominance had a less excitable early visual cortex at baseline and demonstrated a greater degree of vestibular nystagmus suppression following left hemisphere cathodal tDCS. To conclude, our results provide the first demonstration that individual differences in right hemisphere dominance can directly predict both the baseline excitability of low-level brain structures and the degree of top-down modulation exerted over them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.