Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26518415›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2016

Survival of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With or Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Baochi Ou, Jingkun Zhao, Shaopei Guan, Aiguo Lu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rectal Cancer and Radiation in Colitis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Human Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Baochi OuShanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Jingkun ZhaoShanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Shaopei GuanShanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Aiguo LuShanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China. weichuang_lu@163.com.
Ruijin Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but little is known about the influence of IBD on CRC prognosis.

aimsThe aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare survival in CRC patients with IBD (IBD-CRC) and without IBD.

methodsAn electronic search was conducted via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible trials until July 2015. We pooled the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantitatively assess the survival of CRC in patients with or without IBD. In addition, clinicopathological parameters of IBD-CRC versus non-IBD CRC were evaluated.

resultsTwelve studies containing a total of 3472 IBD-CRC patients were eligible according to our selection criteria. Our analysis indicated that CRC patients with IBD had shorter overall survival than those without IBD (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.19-1.29). IBD-CRC showed a propensity to develop in proximal colon [odds ratio (OR) 2.52, 95% CI 1.35-4.72] and correlated with worse differentiation of tumor (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-1.99) compared to non-IBD CRC. Meta-regression analysis showed that sample size (P = 0.002) could explain 99.01% inter-study heterogeneity.

conclusionThis meta-analysis found poorer overall survival in CRC patients with IBD than CRC patients without IBD, and further prospective research to confirm these findings is warranted.

Indexed as

CarcinomaCase-Control StudiesColonColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesOdds RatioPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival RateColorectal cancerInflammatory bowel diseaseMeta-analysisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26518415
OpenAlexW2299925125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.