Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26518299›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2016

Forensic age diagnostics using projection radiography of the clavicle: a prospective multi-center validation study.

Daniel Wittschieber, Christian Ottow, Ronald Schulz, Klaus Püschel, Thomas Bajanowski, Frank Ramsthaler, Heidi Pfeiffer, Volker Vieth, Sven Schmidt, Andreas Schmeling

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Methodology for the identification of vulnerable asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel WittschieberInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany. daniel.wittschieber@ukmuenster.de.
Christian OttowInstitute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Ronald SchulzInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Klaus PüschelInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas BajanowskiInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Frank RamsthalerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Heidi PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Volker ViethInstitute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sven SchmidtInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Andreas SchmelingInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DESaarland University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The radiological investigation of the ossification stage of the medial clavicular epiphysis represents the crucial tool for assessing whether a living individual has completed the age of 18 years. However, exposure to radiation cannot always be accepted due to legal reasons and radiation-free methods still lack reference data or are not available. Therefore, this study examines the role of pre-existing radiographic material of the clavicles, making it necessary to prospectively validate the established five-stage classification system for evaluating the clavicular ossification process as well as to enlarge the so far very limited pool of available reference data. Accordingly, standard posterior-anterior projection radiographs of 836 sternoclavicular joints prospectively obtained during 418 forensic autopsies (age range 15-30 years) were analyzed. Stage III was first found at ages 16 and 15 (males/females), stage IV at ages 22 and 21 (males/females), and stage V at age 26 in both sexes. The presented results principally corroborate the previous reference data from 2004, suggesting reliability of the five-stage classification system. In conclusion, chest radiographs may still be useful for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals but only in certain cases. In age estimations which can be planned in advance, projection radiography of the clavicle must still be considered obsolete.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisAdolescentAdultAge Determination by SkeletonClavicleEpiphysesFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSternoclavicular JointYoung AdultAge estimation in living individualsClavicleFive-stage classification systemOssification processProjection radiography

Identifiers

PMID26518299
OpenAlexW2179093626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.