ArticlePloS one2015
Morphologic and Genotypic Characterization of Psoroptes Mites from Water Buffaloes in Egypt.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Acaricidal Effect of Linoleic Acid and Olive Oil Against Psoroptes cuniculi Mites in Experimentally Infested Rabbits.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
- Synthesis and bioactivity of tetrahydrothiopyran derivatives as potential acaricides against Psoroptes cuniculi.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- First report on the occurrence of psoroptic mange in llamas (Lama glama) of the Andean region.Parasitology research · 2024Article
- Morphological and biochemical characterization of Holstein cow skin at the tail root region susceptible to Chorioptes bovis and texanus parasitism.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2024Article
- Traceback of theInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021Article
- Cox1 barcoding versus multilocus species delimitation: validation of two mite species with contrasting effective population sizes.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Are humans the initial source of canine mange?Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species delimitation of Psoroptes spp. and identity of the parasite in water buffaloes remain poorly defined. In this study, Psoroptes infestation on three water buffalo farms in Egypt was examined based on morphometric characteristics, especially the opisthosomal setae of adult male mites. Clinical investigations showed that 28% (196/700) of the sampled animals had mange infestation. Microscopic examinations of 80 skin scrapings indicated the occurrence of Psoroptes mites in 17 (21.3%) samples, Sarcoptes mites in 27 (33.7%) samples, and the concurrence of both in 36 (45.0%) samples. Morphologically, the Psoroptes parasite was identified as Psoroptes natalensis. DNA sequence analysis of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) in 11 representative samples confirmed the diagnosis and suggested the presence of a distinct variety of Psoroptes natalensis in Egypt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.