Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26517809›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Novel insights into Notum and glypicans regulation in colorectal cancer.

Mariangela De Robertis, Maddalena Arigoni, Luisa Loiacono, Federica Riccardo, Raffaele Adolfo Calogero, Yana Feodorova, Dessislava Tashkova, Vesselin Belovejdov, Victoria Sarafian, Federica Cavallo and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Azoxymethane/Dextran Sodium Sulfate (AOM/DSS) Model of Colorectal Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. GPC1 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Treg Infiltration in Colon Adenocarcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariangela De RobertisLaboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotechnology, Center of Integrated Research, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Maddalena ArigoniDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Luisa LoiaconoLaboratory of Oncology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013-San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy.
Federica RiccardoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Raffaele Adolfo CalogeroDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Yana FeodorovaDepartment of Medical Biology, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Dessislava TashkovaDepartment of General and Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Vesselin BelovejdovDepartment of General and Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Victoria SarafianDepartment of Medical Biology, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Federica CavalloDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Emanuela SignoriLaboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotechnology, Center of Integrated Research, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
University of Turin · ITMedical University Plovdiv · BGIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Farmacologia Traslazionale · ITNational Institute of Emergency Medicine "Pirogov" · BGUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The connection between colorectal cancer (CRC) and Wnt signaling pathway activation is well known, but full elucidation of the underlying regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and its biological functions in CRC pathogenesis is still needed. Here, the azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium salt (AOM/DSS) murine model has been used as an experimental platform able to mimic human sporadic CRC development with predictable timing. We performed genome-wide expression profiling of AOM/DSS-induced tumors and normal colon mucosa to identify potential novel CRC biomarkers. Remarkably, the enhanced expression of Notum, a conserved feedback antagonist of Wnt, was observed in tumors along with alterations in Glypican-1 and Glypican-3 levels. These findings were confirmed in a set of human CRC samples. Here, we provide the first demonstration of significant changes in Notum and glypicans gene expression during CRC development and present evidence to suggest them as potential new biomarkers of CRC pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisColorectal NeoplasmsEsterasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene OntologyGlypicansHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMice, Inbred BALB CBiomarkers, TumorEsterasesGlypicansNotum protein, humanNotum protein, mousecolorectal carcinogenesisglypicansNotumpredictable animal modelsWNT-pathway

Identifiers

PMID26517809
PMCPMC4747403
OpenAlexW1826056963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.