Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26517752›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical pharmacology2016

Short-Term Efficacy Reliably Predicts Long-Term Clinical Benefit in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials as Demonstrated by Model-Based Meta-Analysis.

Yehong Wang, Rui Zhu, Jim Xiao, John C Davis, Jaap W Mandema, Jin Y Jin, Meina T Tang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Joint longitudinal model-based meta-analysis of FEVJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yehong WangClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rui ZhuClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jim XiaoClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
John C DavisClinical Sciences, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jaap W MandemaQuantitative Solutions, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jin Y JinClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Meina T TangClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sunesis (United States) · USAnatolia College · GRKaiser Permanente South San Francisco Medical Center · USQuantitative BioSciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between short-term and long-term treatment effects measured by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 responses and to assess the feasibility of predicting 6-month efficacy from short-term data. A rheumatoid arthritis (RA) database was constructed from 68 reported trials. We focused on the relationship between 3- and 6-month ACR50 treatment effects and developed a generalized nonlinear model to quantify the relationship and test the impact of covariates. The ΔACR50 at 6 months strongly correlated with that at 3 months, moderately correlated with that at 2 months, and only weakly correlated with results obtained at <2 months. A scaling factor that reflected the ratio of 6- to 3-month treatment effects was estimated to be 0.997, suggesting that the treatment effects at 3 months are approaching a "plateau." Drug classes, baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints, and the magnitude of control arm response did not show significant impacts on the scaling factor. This work quantitatively supports the empirical clinical development paradigm of using 3-month efficacy data to predict long-term efficacy and to inform the probability of clinical success based on early efficacy readout.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidClinical Trials as TopicHumansPredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsACR50efficacymeta-analysisrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID26517752
PMCPMC5064749
OpenAlexW2204977091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.