ArticleThe Permanente journal2015
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle for implementation of good pharmacy practice standards: A quality improvement interventional study in a Tertiary care central Hospital of Nepal.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Implementation and evaluation of a quality improvement initiative for central venous catheter management in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Pediatric Preanesthesia Assessment Electronic Triage Tool: Implementation, Quality Improvement, and Retrospective Observational Evaluation of a Patient-Administered Questionnaire.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Observational
- From local change to scholarly contribution: lessons from a scoping review of the gaps and pitfalls of QI reports.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Translating Cancer Genetics Care: Digital Tools to Improve Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment for Patients With Limited English Proficiency.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Reducing NICU ventilator days by preventing fluid overload with the CAN-U-P-LOTS standardized bundle.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Golden Hour protocol for initial management of preterm infants: a quality improvement study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Resident Scholarly Activity and Productivity Outcomes Before and After Implementing a Structured Research Program: A Before-After Study.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Targeting discrepancies in linear growth measurements in the neonatal intensive care unit through nursing interventions: a quality improvement initiative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Increasing and maintaining rates of standardized depression screening in youth with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a pediatric rheumatology clinic.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
- Simulated communication and teamwork scenario for nursing students: construction and validity.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Assessing Emergency Department Staff Knowledge, Competency, and Implementation of Pre- and Post-Trauma-Informed Care Training.Journal of emergency nursing · 2025Article
- Splash Basins in the Operating Room: Clean or Contaminated? A Study on Bacterial Contamination in Splash Basins Used to Rinse Surgical Instruments During Surgery.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Transition to Reusable Surgical Gowns at a Hospital System.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Implementation of a Standardized Shared Decision-making Bundle to Improve Communication Practices in the Neurocritical Care Unit.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- Improving Timely Antibiotic Administration for Pediatric Oncology Patients With Neutropenic Fever Seen in the Emergency Department.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Sexual Harassment Policies at Medical Institutions to Understand Attention to Harassment of Physicians by Patients.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Quality Initiative for the Administration of Vancomycin Prophylaxis in Penicillin-Allergic Neurosurgery Patients.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the publication of Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015, using 1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group; 2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts; and 3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.