Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26516866›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Membrane Potential and Calcium Dynamics in Beta Cells from Mouse Pancreas Tissue Slices: Theory, Experimentation, and Analysis.

Jurij Dolenšek, Denis Špelič, Maša Skelin Klemen, Borut Žalik, Marko Gosak, Marjan Slak Rupnik, Andraž Stožer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jurij DolenšekInstitute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia. jurij.dolensek@um.si.
Denis ŠpeličFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Maša Skelin KlemenInstitute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia. masa.skelin@um.si.
Borut ŽalikFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Marko GosakInstitute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia. marko.gosak@um.si.
Marjan Slak RupnikInstitute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia. marjan.rupnik@um.si.
Andraž StožerInstitute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia. andraz.stozer@um.si.
University of Maribor · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans are precise biological sensors for glucose and play a central role in balancing the organism between catabolic and anabolic needs. A hallmark of the beta cell response to glucose are oscillatory changes of membrane potential that are tightly coupled with oscillatory changes in intracellular calcium concentration which, in turn, elicit oscillations of insulin secretion. Both membrane potential and calcium changes spread from one beta cell to the other in a wave-like manner. In order to assess the properties of the abovementioned responses to physiological and pathological stimuli, the main challenge remains how to effectively measure membrane potential and calcium changes at the same time with high spatial and temporal resolution, and also in as many cells as possible. To date, the most wide-spread approach has employed the electrophysiological patch-clamp method to monitor membrane potential changes. Inherently, this technique has many advantages, such as a direct contact with the cell and a high temporal resolution. However, it allows one to assess information from a single cell only. In some instances, this technique has been used in conjunction with CCD camera-based imaging, offering the opportunity to simultaneously monitor membrane potential and calcium changes, but not in the same cells and not with a reliable cellular or subcellular spatial resolution. Recently, a novel family of highly-sensitive membrane potential reporter dyes in combination with high temporal and spatial confocal calcium imaging allows for simultaneously detecting membrane potential and calcium changes in many cells at a time. Since the signals yielded from both types of reporter dyes are inherently noisy, we have developed complex methods of data denoising that permit for visualization and pixel-wise analysis of signals. Combining the experimental approach of high-resolution imaging with the advanced analysis of noisy data enables novel physiological insights and reassessment of current concepts in unprecedented detail.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumIslets of LangerhansMembrane PotentialsMiceModels, BiologicalOptical ImagingCalciumbeta cellcalcium imagingcalcium sensorsdenoisingmembrane potential imagingmembrane potential sensorspancreaspatch-clamp

Identifiers

PMID26516866
PMCPMC4701238
OpenAlexW1832397049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.