Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26516810›Full record

Trial reportFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery

Adherence to Oral Therapy for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Results from the Anticholinergic Versus Botox Comparison (ABC) Trial.

Anthony G Visco, Linda Brubaker, J Eric Jelovsek, Tracey S Wilson, Peggy Norton, Halina M Zyczynski, Cathie Spino, Larry Sirls, John N Nguyen, David D Rahn and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anthony G ViscoFrom the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; †Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL; ‡Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; §Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; ∥Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; ¶Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; **Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; ††Department of Urology, Beaumont Health System, OUWB School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI; ‡‡Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Downey, Downey, CA; §§Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; ∥∥Gynecologic Health and Disease Branch, The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD and ¶¶RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Linda Brubaker
J Eric Jelovsek
Tracey S Wilson
Peggy Norton
Halina M Zyczynski
Cathie Spino
Larry Sirls
John N Nguyen
David D Rahn
Susie F Meikle
Tracy L Nolen
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

Funding

Pelvic floor Disorders Network-Data Coordinating CenterU01HD041249 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEI, JOHN T · 2001 to 2010
$19.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Data Coordinating Center (U01)U01HD069031 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI GANTZ, MARIE G · 2011 to 2015
$19.7M
Perioperative Pelvic Floor Rehab: A Rrandomized TrialU10HD041261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2015
$5.1M
UNC Pelvic Floor Disorders Research CollaborativeU10HD041267 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VISCO, ANTHONY G · 2001 to 2015
$5.0M
The Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD041250 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2015
$3.8M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
The Cleveland Clinic Clinical SiteU10HD054215 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARBER, MATTHEW D · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 2021UG1HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Dwight Rahn · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (UG1)UG1HD069010 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Heidi S Harvie · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) Clinical SiteUG1HD041267 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAZEMA Y SIDDIQUI · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
Pittsburgh Collab Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery ProgramU10HD041263 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2001 to 2005
$2.3M
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Clinical Sites (U10)U10HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHAFFER, JOSEPH I · 2006 to 2015
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS 1-U01-HD069010-01NICHD NIH HHS 1-U10-HD069006-01NICHD NIH HHS 2-U10-HD041261-11NICHD NIH HHS 2-U10-HD054214-06NICHD NIH HHS 2-U10-HD054215-06NICHD NIH HHS 2-U10-HD054241-06NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD041249NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD069031NICHD NIH HHS U01-HD41249NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041250NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD041250NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041261NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041263NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054136NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD054136NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054215NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054241NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD069010NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041267NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054241NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069006NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD069010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedication adherence with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) treatment is challenging and the best assessment methodology is uncertain. We sought to describe adherence with anticholinergic (AC) versus placebo (P) by comparing pill counts and MEMSCAP event data and to identify factors associated with adherence.

methodsThe randomized controlled AC versus Botox Comparison trial of women with moderate to severe idiopathic UUI included 126 participants initiating AC plus P bladder injection and 121 receiving P pills plus Botox injection. Adherence data on 243 participants (124 AC and 119 P) were calculated by pill count and MEMSCAP data for each 2-month interval during the 6-month study that allowed for dose escalation/drug change. Overall composite adherence estimates were calculated using the average of both methods and weighted by the duration of each 2-month interval.

resultsTreatment groups had no significant differences in dosing duration (P = 0.76) or mean adherence (AC, 83.3% [16.8] vs. P, 84.8% [13.8]). Only 53% of women met the dichotomous outcome of more than 80% adherence during all intervals. Correlation between adherence by pill counts versus MEMSCAP decreased over time with pill counts demonstrating higher adherence than MEMSCAP (r = 0.53, 0.50, and 0.36 for each 2-month interval). Lower adherence was associated with higher baseline incontinence severity and better UUI quality of life for the AC group and with current smoking status in both groups.

conclusionsAdherence using pill counts and MEMSCAP was reasonably correlated and similar in both the AC and P groups. In the AC group, higher baseline incontinence severity and better UUI Quality of Life were associated with decreased adherence. Smokers were less adherent.

Indexed as

Acetylcholine Release InhibitorsAdministration, IntravesicalAdministration, OralBenzilatesBotulinum Toxins, Type ADouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsNortropanesProspective StudiesSolifenacin SuccinateTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, UrgeAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBenzilatesBotulinum Toxins, Type AMuscarinic AntagonistsNortropanesSolifenacin Succinatetrospium chlorideUrological Agents

Identifiers

PMID26516810
PMCPMC4684726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.