Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26516769›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Receptor, Ligand and Transducer Contributions to Dopamine D2 Receptor Functional Selectivity.

Sean M Peterson, Thomas F Pack, Marc G Caron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Biased Dopamine DBiomolecules & therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel and Potent Dopamine DACS pharmacology & translational science · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. New Concepts in Dopamine DBiological psychiatry · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean M PetersonDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Thomas F PackDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Marc G CaronDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Akt/GSK-3 Signaling Cascade and the Actions of DopamineR37MH073853 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CARON, MARC G. · 2011 to 2020
$6.4M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R37MH073853NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH073853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional selectivity (or biased agonism) is a property exhibited by some G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands, which results in the modulation of a subset of a receptor's signaling capabilities and more precise control over complex biological processes. The dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) exhibits pleiotropic responses to the biogenic amine dopamine (DA) to mediate complex central nervous system functions through activation of G proteins and β-arrestins. D2R is a prominent therapeutic target for psychological and neurological disorders in which DA biology is dysregulated and targeting D2R with functionally selective drugs could provide a means by which pharmacotherapies could be developed. However, factors that determine GPCR functional selectivity in vivo may be multiple with receptors, ligands and transducers contributing to the process. We have recently described a mutagenesis approach to engineer biased D2R mutants in which G protein-dependent ([Gprot]D2R) and β-arrestin-dependent signaling ([βarr]D2R) were successfully separated (Peterson, et al. PNAS, 2015). Here, permutations of these mutants were used to identify critical determinants of the D2R signaling complex that impart signaling bias in response to the natural or synthetic ligands. Critical residues identified in generating [Gprot]D2R and [βarr]D2R conferred control of partial agonism at G protein and/or β-arrestin activity. Another set of mutations that result in G protein bias was identified that demonstrated that full agonists can impart unique activation patterns, and provided further credence to the concept of ligand texture. Finally, the contributions and interplay between different transducers indicated that G proteins are not aberrantly activated, and that receptor kinase and β-arrestin activities are inextricably linked. These data provide a thorough elucidation of the feasibility and malleability of D2R functional selectivity and point to means by which novel in vivo therapies could be modeled.

Indexed as

Arrestinsbeta-ArrestinsBinding SitesDopamineGTP-Binding ProteinsHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsModels, MolecularMutagenesisReceptors, Dopamine D2Signal TransductionArrestinsbeta-ArrestinsDopamineDRD2 protein, humanGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID26516769
PMCPMC4627803
OpenAlexW1962631341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.