ArticleBritish journal of pain2012
The evidence base for managing older persons with low back pain.
Article in British journal of pain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A philosophical critique of the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline 'Palliative care for adults: strong opioids for pain relief'.British journal of pain · 2018Article
- [Activating physiotherapy for chronic pain in elderly patients. Recommendations, barriers and resources].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Review
- Pain reporting in older adults: the influence of cognitive impairment - results from the Cambridge City >75 Cohort study.British journal of pain · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been suggested that older persons are less likely to receive optimal care for pain, and a recent population study suggested that management of low back pain (LBP) in primary care differed with older age. Low back pain is the most commonly reported regional pain syndrome, and the objective of the current review was to determine the evidence base for managing LBP in older persons; specifically, to ascertain if randomized controlled trials provide information on the effectiveness of two common non-pharmacological treatments (manual therapy, physical activity/exercise) for LBP amongst older patients. We examine data from trials which contributed to the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the management of LBP and determine whether the trials had upper age restrictions, their justification and whether any age-specific analyses had been conducted. The present survey included 21 studies of manual therapy and 71 of physical activity/exercise. Many studies had an upper age limit of ≤ 60 years (24% manual therapy, 44% physical activity/exercise) or 61-70 years (33%, 41%) but few gave a rationale for imposing an upper age limit in the trial eligibility criteria (2 out of 17 studies of manual therapy, 4 out of 68 studies of physical activity/exercise). Only 14% of studies of manual therapy and 1% of physical activity/exercise studies provided an age-specific analysis. Upper age limits in back pain trials of manual therapy and physical activity/exercise are common but a justification for these is rarely given. Almost no studies have reported whether effectiveness differs by age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.