ArticleBritish journal of pain2012
Interprofessional pain education: definitions, exemplars and future directions.
Article in British journal of pain, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Project ECHOBMC medical education · 2023Article
- The Pain Medicine Curriculum Framework-structured integration of pain medicine education into the medical curriculum.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The IASP pain curriculum for undergraduate allied health professionals: educators defining competence level using Dublin descriptors.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- [Interprofessional pain education-with, from, and about competent, collaborative practice teams to transform pain care].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Review
- An examination of the perceived impact of a continuing interprofessional education experience on opiate prescribing practices.Journal of interprofessional care · 2018Article
- Interprofessional pain education-with, from, and about competent, collaborative practice teams to transform pain care.Pain reports · 2018Article
- Assessing knowledge, perceptions and attitudes to pain management among medical and nursing students: a review of the literature.British journal of pain · 2016Article
- Interprofessional pain learning and working: different perspectives.British journal of pain · 2012Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The management of pain frequently requires healthcare professionals (HCPs) to work together; thus, educational preparation should afford them opportunities to learn about the management of pain together. 2. Survey data suggest that most HCPs' curricula do not provide opportunities for learners to come together to learn about pain and understand their professional roles. 3. Despite the growth of published evaluations of interprofessional education (IPE) and pain, the ability to draw firm conclusions has been hampered by the lack of methodological heterogeneity across studies. 4. New directions in IPE and pain include innovative pedagogical approaches, web-based learning, standardised patients and simulated learning. 5. Harnessing the political agenda can offer a valuable opportunity to raise the profile and prominence of pain education for HCPs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.