Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26516301›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics & bioinformatics

Mining the Breast Cancer Proteome for Predictors of Drug Sensitivity.

Leslie C Timpe, Dian Li, Ten-Yang Yen, Judi Wong, Roger Yen, Bruce A Macher, Alexandra Piryatinska

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics & bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  4. Methods, Tools and Current Perspectives in Proteogenomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leslie C TimpeDepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
Dian LiDepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
Ten-Yang YenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
Judi WongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
Roger YenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
Bruce A MacherDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
Alexandra PiryatinskaDepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA.
San Francisco State University · US

Funding

Student EnrichmentP20MD000544 · NIMHD · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAIRD, TEASTER T · 2003 to 2012
$9.4M
Glycoprotein Signatures as Biomarkers for Breast CancerR15CA164929 · NCI · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MACHER, BRUCE A., TIMPE, LESLIE CHARLES · 2012 to 2012
$462k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA164929NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 20 drugs have been approved by the FDA for breast cancer treatment, yet predictive biomarkers are known for only a few of these. The identification of additional biomarkers would be useful both for drugs currently approved for breast cancer treatment and for new drug development. Using glycoprotein expression data collected via mass spectrometry, in conjunction with statistical models constructed by elastic net or lasso regression, we modeled quantitatively the responses of breast cancer cell lines to ~90 drugs. Lasso and elastic net regression identified HER2 as a predictor protein for lapatinib, afatinib, gefitinib and erlotinib, which target HER2 or the EGF receptor, thus providing an internal control for the approach. Two additional protein datasets and two RNA datasets were also tested as sources of predictor proteins for modeling drug sensitivity. Protein expression measured by mass spectrometry gave models with higher coefficients of determination than did reverse phase protein array (RPPA) predictor data. Further, cross validation of the elastic net models shows that, for many drugs, the prediction error is lower when the predictor data is from proteins, rather than mRNA expression measured on microarrays. Drugs that could be modeled effectively include PI3K inhibitors, Akt inhibitors, paclitaxel and docetaxel, rapamycin, everolimus and temsirolimus, gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Strikingly, this modeling approach with protein predictors often succeeds for drugs that are targeted agents, even when the nominal target is not in the dataset.

Indexed as

Breast cancer cell linesChemotherapyElastic net regressionLasso regressionMass spectrometryStatistical modelingTargeted agents

Identifiers

PMID26516301
PMCPMC4621756
OpenAlexW1901442483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.