Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26516211›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2016

NeuroD1 reprograms chromatin and transcription factor landscapes to induce the neuronal program.

Abhijeet Pataskar, Johannes Jung, Pawel Smialowski, Florian Noack, Federico Calegari, Tobias Straub, Vijay K Tiwari

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuronal Activity Suppresses NEUROD-Dependent Transcription and Genome Organization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sponge bHLH Gene Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abhijeet PataskarInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.
Johannes JungInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.
Pawel SmialowskiAdolf Butenandt Institute and Center for Integrated Protein Science, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Florian NoackDFG-Research Center for Regenerative Therapies, Cluster of Excellence, TU-Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Federico CalegariDFG-Research Center for Regenerative Therapies, Cluster of Excellence, TU-Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Tobias StraubAdolf Butenandt Institute and Center for Integrated Protein Science, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Vijay K TiwariInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany v.tiwari@imb-mainz.de.
Institute of Molecular Biology · DECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fate specification relies on the action of critical transcription factors that become available at distinct stages of embryonic development. One such factor is NeuroD1, which is essential for eliciting the neuronal development program and possesses the ability to reprogram other cell types into neurons. Given this capacity, it is important to understand its targets and the mechanism underlying neuronal specification. Here, we show that NeuroD1 directly binds regulatory elements of neuronal genes that are developmentally silenced by epigenetic mechanisms. This targeting is sufficient to initiate events that confer transcriptional competence, including reprogramming of transcription factor landscape, conversion of heterochromatin to euchromatin, and increased chromatin accessibility, indicating potential pioneer factor ability of NeuroD1. The transcriptional induction of neuronal fate genes is maintained via epigenetic memory despite a transient NeuroD1 induction during neurogenesis. NeuroD1 also induces genes involved in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, thereby promoting neuronal migration. Our study not only reveals the NeuroD1-dependent gene regulatory program driving neurogenesis but also increases our understanding of how cell fate specification during development involves a concerted action of transcription factors and epigenetic mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell LineChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksMiceNeuronsTranscription FactorsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsChromatinNeurod1 protein, mouseTranscription Factorsepigeneticsgene regulationNeuroD1neurogenesispioneer transcription factor

Identifiers

PMID26516211
PMCPMC4718003
OpenAlexW1861340857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.