ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2015
In vivo study of the early bone-bonding ability of Ti meshes formed with calcium titanate via chemical treatments.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial Properties and Biocompatibility of Multicomponent Titanium Oxides: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advanced surface engineering of titanium materials for biomedical applications: From static modification to dynamic responsive regulation.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Article
- Two-in-One Biointerfaces-Antimicrobial and Bioactive Nanoporous Gallium Titanate Layers for Titanium Implants.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- A superhydrophilic titanium implant functionalized by ozone gas modulates bone marrow cell and macrophage responses.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alkali and heat (AH) treatment forming sodium titanate has been shown to connect bioinert Ti metal and bone tissue. Artificial joints treated with this method have achieved extensive clinical application. Recently a new chemical treatment of Alkali-Calcium-Heat-Water (ACaHW) treatment forming calcium titanate was proposed. Notably, the apatite-forming ability of this treatment is greater than that of AH treatment, as verified in vitro. However, the early bone-bonding abilities of the two treatments have not been compared in vivo. To simulate clinical application, we treated a commercially pure Ti (Cp-Ti) mesh implant with AH or ACaHW. Then, using mechanical and histological methods, we compared the bone-bonding abilities of the two treatments early during the implantation process (2-4 weeks); untreated Cp-Ti mesh was used as a control. Because the mesh structure might influence bone-bonding ability, we compared these bonding abilities with values obtained at 4 and 8 weeks using a Cp-Ti implant with a plate structure. In the mesh group, histological comparisons at 2 and 3 weeks indicated that ACaHW treatment resulted in a bone-bonding ability similar to that of AH treatment; ACaHW exhibited a greater bonding ability than AH at 4 weeks. However, in tests of the plate group at later time points, such differences were not apparent. The results obtained here indicate that during the early stage of embedment, ACaHW treatment of Cp-Ti mesh implants yields a higher bone-bonding ability than AH treatment, thus providing a positive reference for future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26515374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.