Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26515108›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2016

Rural-Urban Differences in Chronic Disease and Drug Utilization in Older Oregonians.

Leah M Goeres, Allison Gille, Jon P Furuno, Deniz Erten-Lyons, Daniel M Hartung, James F Calvert, Sharia M Ahmed, David S H Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain across the US rural-urban continuum, 2019-2020.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leah M GoeresDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Allison GilleDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jon P FurunoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Deniz Erten-LyonsDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Daniel M HartungDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
James F CalvertDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Klamath Falls, Oregon.
Sharia M AhmedDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
David S H LeeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Outreach, Recruitment and Education CoreP30AG008017 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, HIROKO HAYAMA · 1990 to 2019
$27.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize disease burden and medication usage in rural and urban adults aged ≥85 years.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of 5 years of longitudinal data starting in the year 2000 from 3 brain-aging studies. Cohorts consisted of community-dwelling adults: 1 rural cohort, the Klamath Exceptional Aging Project (KEAP), was compared to 2 urban cohorts, the Oregon Brain Aging Study (OBAS) and the Dementia Prevention study (DPS). In this analysis, 121 participants were included from OBAS/DPS and 175 participants were included from KEAP. Eligibility was determined based on age ≥85 years and having at least 2 follow-up visits after the year 2000. Disease burden was measured by the Modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (MCIRS), with higher values representing more disease. Medication usage was measured by the estimated mean number of medications used by each cohort.

findingsRural participants had significantly higher disease burden as measured by MCIRS, 23.0 (95% CI: 22.3-23.6), than urban participants, 21.0 (95% CI: 20.2-21.7), at baseline. The rate of disease accumulation was a 0.2 increase in MCIRS per year (95% CI: 0.05-0.34) in the rural population. Rural participants used a higher mean number of medications, 5.5 (95% CI: 4.8-6.1), than urban participants, 3.7 (95% CI: 3.1-4.2), at baseline (P < .0001).

conclusionsThese data suggest that rural and urban Oregonians aged ≥85 years may differ by disease burden and medication usage. Future research should identify opportunities to improve health care for older adults.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesDrug UtilizationFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleOriganumResidence CharacteristicsRural Health ServicesRural PopulationUrban Health ServicesUrban Populationdrugsmedicationsmultimorbidityolderrural

Identifiers

PMID26515108
PMCPMC5116378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.