Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26514824›Full record

ReviewActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2016

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice.

A Feldheiser, O Aziz, G Baldini, B P B W Cox, K C H Fearon, L S Feldman, T J Gan, R H Kennedy, O Ljungqvist, D N Lobo and 8 more

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 270 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
29.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03204344 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate on Recovery in Diabetic Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDong-Xin WangRan2017 to 2018Enrolled65ConditionsGastrointestinal SurgeryArmsOral carbohydrate (Outfast), Routine fasting
NCT03403842 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Acute Post-operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colon Resections

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2018 to 2019Enrolled159ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsSublingual sufentanil tablet system, Peridural catheter, PCA Morphine
NCT05465499 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Preliminary Survey in Preparation for the Implementation of ERAS at Dr Soetomo Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorDr. Soetomo General HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled207ConditionsERASArmsERAS
NCT06009224 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Hepatobiliary-Pancreas (HBP) Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled334ConditionsPeriampullary Cancer, Borderline Malignancy TumorArmsERAS perioperative management
NCT06137976 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Surgeon Perception of Gastric Decompression at Time of Gynecologic Laparoscopy, a Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsGynecologic Surgical Procedures, Gastric Injury, Aspiration, Nausea, PostoperativeArmsGastric decompression (oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal gastric tube)
NCT06566976 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prehabilitation and Rehabilitation in PAD: A Randomized Exercise Intervention Trial (PREPARE-IT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchRan2024 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsPeripheral Arterial DiseaseArmsExercise Intervention, VAPAHCS Rehabilitation Core Components
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 672 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. 2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Effect of Perioperative Nutritional Supplementation on Postoperative Complications-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

A FeldheiserDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité, Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
O AzizSt. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.
G BaldiniDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
B P B W CoxDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Maastricht (azM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
K C H FearonUniversity of Edinburgh, The Royal Infirmary, Clinical Surgery, Edinburgh, UK.
L S FeldmanDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
T J GanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
R H KennedySt. Mark's Hospital/Imperial College, Harrow, Middlesex/London, UK.
O LjungqvistDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
D N LoboGastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
T MillerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
F F RadtkeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité, Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
T Ruiz GarcesAnestesiologa y Reanimacin, Hospital Clinico Lozano Blesa, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
T SchrickerDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
M J ScottRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
J K ThackerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
L M YtrebøDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway.
F CarliDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDuke University · USMontreal General Hospital · CASt Mark's Hospital · GBDuke Medical Center · USEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMcGill University Health Centre · CANational Institute for Health Research · GBÖrebro University · SERoyal Victoria Hospital · CAUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present interdisciplinary consensus review proposes clinical considerations and recommendations for anaesthetic practice in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programme.

methodsStudies were selected with particular attention being paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined and reviewed. The group reached a consensus recommendation after critical appraisal of the literature.

resultsThis consensus statement demonstrates that anaesthesiologists control several preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative ERAS elements. Further research is needed to verify the strength of these recommendations.

conclusionsBased on the evidence available for each element of perioperative care pathways, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society presents a comprehensive consensus review, clinical considerations and recommendations for anaesthesia care in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery within an ERAS programme. This unified protocol facilitates involvement of anaesthesiologists in the implementation of the ERAS programmes and allows for comparison between centres and it eventually might facilitate the design of multi-institutional prospective and adequately powered randomized trials.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaConsensusDigestive System Surgical ProceduresAcute Kidney InjuryHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMonitoring, PhysiologicPostoperative Nausea and VomitingRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID26514824
PMCPMC5061107
OpenAlexW1954858097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.