ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2016
[Decision conflicts with relatives in the intensive care unit].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIf medicine is coming close to its limits conflicts sometimes occur. Most conflicts in the intensive care unit (ICU) involve the medical team and patients' relatives. In particular decisions about withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy lead to conflicts. Decisions about limiting life-sustaining treatment are burdened by conflicts and put an enormous strain particularly on relatives.
aimIllustration of currently available studies and existing recommendations on how to manage potentially conflict-laden decision-finding discussions on the ICU are presented. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis article is based on a selective literature research in the PubMed database.
resultsStudies have been carried out to evaluate posttraumatic stress disorders in relatives who were involved in life-limiting treatment decisions. Conflicts on the ICU put an emotional strain on relatives. Evidence-based recommendations are available regarding physicians' attitudes during discussions about therapy decisions, communication style and other contextual factors. Study results show that the emotional stress level relatives have to endure can be reduced if conversations between patients' families and the clinical personnel were conducted according to these recommendations. The involvement of a clinical ethics committee can prevent conflicts and has been shown to have no impact on the mortality rate but does decrease the time life-sustaining measures were unsuccessfully pursued.
conclusionTo prevent conflicts between the medical personnel and patients' relatives on the ICU, a timely, congruent and empathic conversation style in an appropriate, quiet environment is essential. Consultation with clinical ethics committees is recommended to de-escalate disputes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26514821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.