ArticleImmunologic research2015
A pilot study to determine the optimal timing of the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Immunologic research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase 1 double-blind randomized safety trial of the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in systemic lupus erythematosus.Nature communications · 2021Trial
- Pregnancy outcomes between pregnant systemic lupus erythematosus patients with clinical remission and those with low disease activity: A comparative study.Archives of rheumatology · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Can Lupus Patients Take the Driver's Seat in Their Disease Monitoring?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- New therapeutic strategies in systemic lupus erythematosus management.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Physician Global Assessment (PGA) is an important and useful outcome measurement of lupus disease activity, but consensus on whether the PGA should be performed prior to or after the receipt of laboratory values is lacking. The objective of this study was to collect preliminary data on the optimal time to perform a PGA. In this pilot study, a PGA was performed by a single clinician upon completion of an outpatient clinical encounter and again after receipt of pertinent laboratory values. Laboratory values obtained at each clinical visit included a CBC, comprehensive chemistries, C3, C4, anti-dsDNA antibody levels, urinalysis and, if pertinent, a spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio. Disease activity was additionally determined by the SELENA-SLEDAI. Fifty-four patients, 3 males and 51 females with an average SLE disease duration of 12.3 (SD 10.5) years contributed 74 assessments to this study. The average SELENA-SLEDAI was 2.2. The average pre-laboratory PGA was 0.46, and the average post-laboratory PGA was 0.55 (p < 0.02 paired Student's t test). Among the 48 encounters with active disease and a mean SELENA-SLEDAI of 3.37, concordance of the pre-laboratory and post-laboratory PGAs occurred in only third of the patient encounters. Both pre- and post-PGA correlated with the SELENA-SLEDAI. However, the correlation of the post-PGA with the SELENA-SLEDAI was significantly greater than the correlation of the pre-PGA and SELENA-SLEDAI [r = 0.69 vs 0.79, respectively (p < 0.0179)]. In some lupus patients, the PGA determined prior to receipt of laboratory values may be the same as the PGA determined after laboratory values are received. However, in these preliminary data, there was a significant difference between pre-laboratory and post-laboratory PGA with a significantly greater correlation of the post-laboratory PGA with the SELENA-SLEDAI. Further studies in a larger patient population with a greater range of disease activity are needed to confirm and extend these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.