ArticleExperimental brain research2016
The effect of dual-task difficulty on the inhibition of the motor cortex.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Program-Care in Informal Caregivers of People with Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Task-dependent changes in the cortical control of postural dual tasks: effects of secondary cognitive and motor tasks.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Motor Intention Drives Corticospinal Facilitation during Interception Planning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Effects of divided attention on movement-related cortical potential in community-dwelling elderly adults: A preliminary study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Neurophysiological and gait outcomes during a dual-task gait assessment in concussed adolescents.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2023Article
- Obstacle avoidance movement-related motor cortical activity with cognitive task.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Reduced motor cortex inhibition and a 'cognitive-first' prioritisation strategy for older adults during dual-tasking.Experimental gerontology · 2018Article
- Neuromuscular Control Deficits and the Risk of Subsequent Injury after a Concussion: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- Considering neurophysiological mechanisms of dual-tasking in people with multiple sclerosis: an exploratory, cross-sectional small-N study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-tasking is intrinsic to many daily activities, including walking and driving. However, the activity of the primary motor cortex (M1) in response to dual-tasks (DT) is still not well characterised. A recent meta-analysis (Corp in Neurosci Biobehav Rev 43:74-87, 2014) demonstrated a reduction in M1 inhibition during dual-tasking, yet responses were not consistent between studies. It was suggested that DT difficulty might account for some of this between-study variability. The aim of this study was to investigate whether corticospinal excitability and M1 inhibition differed between an easier and more difficult dual-task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to participants' abductor pollicis brevis muscle representation during a concurrent pincer grip task and stationary bike-riding. The margin of error in which to maintain pincer grip force was reduced to increase task difficulty. Compared to ST conditions, significantly increased M1 inhibition was demonstrated for the easier, but not more difficult, DT. However, there was no significant difference in M1 inhibition between easy and difficult DTs. The difference in difficulty between the two tasks may not have been wide enough to result in significant differences in M1 inhibition. Increased M1 inhibition for the easy DT condition was in opposition to the reduction in M1 inhibition found in our meta-analysis (Corp in Neurosci Biobehav Rev 43:74-87, 2014). We propose that this may be partially explained by differences in the timing of the TMS pulse between DT studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26514811What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.