Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26514611›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transcranial Doppler for Brain Death Confirmation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J J Chang, G Tsivgoulis, A H Katsanos, M D Malkoff, A V Alexandrov

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Ancillary tests for brain death.Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. POCUS, how can we include the brain? An overview.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J J ChangFrom the Department of Neurology (J.J.C., G.T., M.D.M., A.V.A.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee jjwchang@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0825-3008
G TsivgoulisFrom the Department of Neurology (J.J.C., G.T., M.D.M., A.V.A.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee Second Department of Neurology (G.T., A.H.K.), Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece International Clinical Research Center (G.T.), St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-3797
A H KatsanosSecond Department of Neurology (G.T., A.H.K.), Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece Department of Neurology (A.H.K.), University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Epirus, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-0023
M D MalkoffFrom the Department of Neurology (J.J.C., G.T., M.D.M., A.V.A.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-3114
A V AlexandrovFrom the Department of Neurology (J.J.C., G.T., M.D.M., A.V.A.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-1023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTranscranial Doppler is a useful ancillary test for brain death confirmation because it is safe, noninvasive, and done at the bedside. Transcranial Doppler confirms brain death by evaluating cerebral circulatory arrest. Case series studies have generally reported good correlations between transcranial Doppler confirmation of cerebral circulatory arrest and clinical confirmation of brain death. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of transcranial Doppler as an ancillary test in brain death confirmation. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature and a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to compare the sensitivity and specificity of transcranial Doppler confirmation of cerebral circulatory arrest, by using clinical confirmation of brain death as the criterion standard.

resultsWe identified 22 eligible studies (1671 patients total), dating from 1987 to 2014. Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates from 12 study protocols that reported data for the calculation of both values were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), respectively. Between-study differences in the diagnostic performance of transcranial Doppler were found for both sensitivity (I(2) = 76%; P < .001) and specificity (I(2) = 74.3%; P < .001). The threshold effect was not significant (Spearman r = -0.173; P = .612). The area under the curve with the corresponding standard error (SE) was 0.964 ± 0.018, while index Q test ± SE was estimated at 0.910 ± 0.028.

conclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that transcranial Doppler is a highly accurate ancillary test for brain death confirmation. However, transcranial Doppler evaluates cerebral circulatory arrest rather than brain stem function, and this limitation needs to be taken into account when interpreting the results of this meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Brain DeathFemaleHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID26514611
PMCPMC7960140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.