Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26514579›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2016

Aerosolized Non-viral Nucleic Acid Delivery in the Vaginal Tract of Pigs.

Katrien Remaut, Evelien De Clercq, Oliwia Andries, Koen Rombouts, Matthias Van Gils, Laetitia Cicchelero, Ian Vandenbussche, Sarah Van Praet, Juan Manuel Benito, José Manuel Garcia Fernandéz and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cyclodextrin-Based Functional Glyconanomaterials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrien RemautLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Evelien De ClercqLaboratory of Immunology and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Oliwia AndriesLaboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Koen RomboutsLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Matthias Van GilsLaboratory of Immunology and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Laetitia CiccheleroLaboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ian VandenbusscheLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah Van PraetLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Juan Manuel BenitoInstitute for Chemical Research, CSIC, University of Sevilla, Americo Vespucio 49, Isla de la Cartuja, E-41092, Sevilla, Spain.
José Manuel Garcia FernandézInstitute for Chemical Research, CSIC, University of Sevilla, Americo Vespucio 49, Isla de la Cartuja, E-41092, Sevilla, Spain.
Niek SandersLaboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, B-9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Daisy VanrompayLaboratory of Immunology and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium. Daisy.Vanrompay@ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEInstituto de Investigaciones Químicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis is worldwide the leading cause of bacterial sexually transmitted disease. Nasal or vaginal nucleic acid vaccination is a promising strategy for controlling genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Since naked nucleic acids are generally not efficiently taken up by cells, they are often complexed with carriers that facilitate their intracellular delivery.

methodsIn the current study, we screened a variety of commonly used non-viral gene delivery carriers for their ability to transfect newborn pig tracheal cells. The effect of aerosolization on the physicochemical properties and transfection efficiency of the complexes was also evaluated in vitro. Subsequently, a pilot experiment was performed in which the selected complexes were aerosolized in the vaginal tract of pigs.

resultsBoth mRNA and pDNA containing lipofectamine and ADM70 complexes showed promise for protein expression in vitro, before and after aerosolization. In vivo, only lipofectamine/pDNA complexes resulted in high protein expression levels 24 h following aerosolization. This correlates to the unexpected observation that the presence of vaginal mucus increases the efficiency of lipofectamine/pDNA complexes 3-fold, while the efficiency of lipofectamine/mRNA complexes and ADM70/mRNA and ADM70/pDNA complexes decreased.

conclusionsAs aerosolization was an easy and effective method to deliver complexes to the vaginal tract of pigs, we believe this application technique has future potential for both vaginal and perhaps nasal vaccination using non-viral gene delivery vectors.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAerosolsAnimalsCell LineDNADrug CarriersFemalePlasmidsRNA, MessengerSwineTransfectionVaginaAerosolsDNADrug CarriersRNA, MessengeraerosolizationmRNAnon-viral gene delivery complexesplasmid DNAvaginal administration

Identifiers

PMID26514579
OpenAlexW1925248294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.