Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26514350›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2015

Repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes.

Maria Assunta Biscotti, Ettore Olmo, J S Pat Heslop-Harrison

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed
37.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 394 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Satellite DNAs in Drosophila koepferae (repleta group) reveal patterns of origin, chromosomal organization, transcription, and turnover in the buzzatii cluster.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Satellite DNA evolution in two holocentric species of Edessa true bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with unusually high heterochromatin abundance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The First Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Emergence of satellite DNAs suggests centromeric repositioning as a driver of karyotypic variation of the freshwater darter characines (Apareiodon affinis).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Comparative Genomics Reveals Host-Specific Adaptation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The repeatome landscape in the "Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  16. Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  17. Fish mapping of rdna and novel tandem repeats inComparative cytogenetics · 2026
    Article
  18. Comparative Analysis of Satellite DNA inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Assunta BiscottiDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, 60131, Italy.
Ettore OlmoDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, 60131, Italy.
J S Pat Heslop-HarrisonDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. Phh4@le.ac.uk.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive DNA--sequence motifs repeated hundreds or thousands of times in the genome--makes up the major proportion of all the nuclear DNA in most eukaryotic genomes. However, the significance of repetitive DNA in the genome is not completely understood, and it has been considered to have both structural and functional roles, or perhaps even no essential role. High-throughput DNA sequencing reveals huge numbers of repetitive sequences. Most bioinformatic studies focus on low-copy DNA including genes, and hence, the analyses collapse repeats in assemblies presenting only one or a few copies, often masking out and ignoring them in both DNA and RNA read data. Chromosomal studies are proving vital to examine the distribution and evolution of sequences because of the challenges of analysis of sequence data. Many questions are open about the origin, evolutionary mode and functions that repetitive sequences might have in the genome. Some, the satellite DNAs, are present in long arrays of similar motifs at a small number of sites, while others, particularly the transposable elements (DNA transposons and retrotranposons), are dispersed over regions of the genome; in both cases, sequence motifs may be located at relatively specific chromosome domains such as centromeres or subtelomeric regions. Here, we overview a range of works involving detailed characterization of the nature of all types of repetitive sequences, in particular their organization, abundance, chromosome localization, variation in sequence within and between chromosomes, and, importantly, the investigation of their transcription or expression activity. Comparison of the nature and locations of sequences between more, and less, related species is providing extensive information about their evolution and amplification. Some repetitive sequences are extremely well conserved between species, while others are among the most variable, defining differences between even closely relative species. These data suggest contrasting modes of evolution of repetitive DNA of different types, including selfish sequences that propagate themselves and may even be transferred horizontally between species rather than by descent, through to sequences that have a tendency to amplification because of their sequence motifs, to those that have structural significance because of their bulk rather than precise sequence. Functional consequences of repeats include generation of variability by movement and insertion in the genome (giving useful genetic markers), the definition of centromeres, expression under stress conditions and regulation of gene expression via RNA moieties. Molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatic studies in a comparative context are now enabling understanding of the nature and behaviour of this major genomic component.

Indexed as

DNAGenomeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidEukaryotaGenomicsDNAGenomicsJunk DNARepetitive DNARetrotransposonsReviewSatellite DNATandem repeatsTransposons

Identifiers

PMID26514350
OpenAlexW1849542996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.