Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26514139›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

New endoscopic platform for endoluminal en bloc tissue resection in the gastrointestinal tract (with videos).

Sergey V Kantsevoy, Marianne Bitner, Gregory Piskun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
  11. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal nongranular laterally spreading tumor with the use of a new endoscopic platform.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Introduction of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergey V KantsevoyInstitute for Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, 301 St. Paul Place, POB 7th Floor, Suite 718, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA. skan51@hotmail.com.
Marianne BitnerInstitute for Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, 301 St. Paul Place, POB 7th Floor, Suite 718, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Gregory PiskunLumenR LLC, Oxford, CT, USA.
Lumen (United Kingdom) · GBMercy Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic removal of gastrointestinal tract lesions is increasingly popular around the world. We evaluated feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and user learning curve of new endoscopic platform for complex intraluminal interventions.

methodsA novel system, consisting of expandable working chamber with two independent instrument guides (LIG), was inserted into colon. Simulated colonic lesions were removed with endoscopic submucosal (ESD) and submuscular (ESmD) dissection.

resultsIn all nine in vivo models, an intraluminal chamber and its dynamic tissue retractors (via LIG) provided a stable working space with excellent visualization and adequate access to target tissue. Endoscopic platform facilitated successful completion of 11 en bloc ESDs (mean size 43.0 ± 11.3 mm, mean time 46.3 ± 41.2 min) and eight ESmD (mean size 50.0 ± 14.1 mm, mean time 48.0 ± 21.2 min). The learning curve for ESD using this platform demonstrated three phases: rapid improvement in procedural skills took place during the first three procedures (mean ESD time 98.7 ± 40.0 min). A plateau phase then occurred (procedures 4-7) with mean procedure time 42.0 ± 13.4 min (p = 0.04), followed by another sharp improvement in procedural skills (procedures 8-11) requiring only 16.3 ± 11.4 min (p = 0.03) to complete ESD. Especially dramatic (p = 0.002) was the time difference between the first three procedures (mean time 98.7 ± 40.0 min) and subsequent eight procedures (mean time 29.1 ± 17.9 min).

conclusionsA newly developed endoscopic platform provides stable intraluminal working space, dynamic tissue retraction, and instrument triangulation, improving visualization and access to the target tissue for safer and more effective en bloc endoscopic submucosal and submuscular dissection. The learning curve for ESD was markedly facilitated by this new endoscopic platform.

Indexed as

AnimalsColonColonic NeoplasmsColonoscopesColonoscopyDisease Models, AnimalDissectionEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesGastric MucosaSwineVideotape RecordingColon cancerColonoscopyEn bloc resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionESDPolyps

Identifiers

PMID26514139
OpenAlexW1923897983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.