ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016
New endoscopic platform for endoluminal en bloc tissue resection in the gastrointestinal tract (with videos).
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Freedom to innovate: the story of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery and the endoscopic suturing device.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- The Role of Specialized Instruments for Advanced Endoscopic Resections in Gastrointestinal Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Pilot study on a new endoscopic platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Current Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Gastrointestinal Lesions: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Submucosal Dissection, and Full-Thickness Resection.Visceral medicine · 2021Review
- Evaluation of improved bi-manual endoscopic resection using a customizable 3D-printed manipulator system designed for use with standard endoscopes: a feasibility study using a porcine ex-vivo model.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Double-clip traction could be superior to the pocket-creation method with cylindrical cap for colonic ESD: a randomized study in an ex vivo model.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- ESD and Pit Pattern Diagnosis: Lessons from a Japanese Endoscopist Working in the United States.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020Review
- UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal nongranular laterally spreading tumor with the use of a new endoscopic platform.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019Article
- Improved endoscopic resection of large flat lesions and early cancers using an external additional working channel (AWC): a case series.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Efficacy and safety of an internal magnet traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo study in a porcine model (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Introduction of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018Review
- Recent advances in the management of large and complex colonic polyps.F1000Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic removal of gastrointestinal tract lesions is increasingly popular around the world. We evaluated feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and user learning curve of new endoscopic platform for complex intraluminal interventions.
methodsA novel system, consisting of expandable working chamber with two independent instrument guides (LIG), was inserted into colon. Simulated colonic lesions were removed with endoscopic submucosal (ESD) and submuscular (ESmD) dissection.
resultsIn all nine in vivo models, an intraluminal chamber and its dynamic tissue retractors (via LIG) provided a stable working space with excellent visualization and adequate access to target tissue. Endoscopic platform facilitated successful completion of 11 en bloc ESDs (mean size 43.0 ± 11.3 mm, mean time 46.3 ± 41.2 min) and eight ESmD (mean size 50.0 ± 14.1 mm, mean time 48.0 ± 21.2 min). The learning curve for ESD using this platform demonstrated three phases: rapid improvement in procedural skills took place during the first three procedures (mean ESD time 98.7 ± 40.0 min). A plateau phase then occurred (procedures 4-7) with mean procedure time 42.0 ± 13.4 min (p = 0.04), followed by another sharp improvement in procedural skills (procedures 8-11) requiring only 16.3 ± 11.4 min (p = 0.03) to complete ESD. Especially dramatic (p = 0.002) was the time difference between the first three procedures (mean time 98.7 ± 40.0 min) and subsequent eight procedures (mean time 29.1 ± 17.9 min).
conclusionsA newly developed endoscopic platform provides stable intraluminal working space, dynamic tissue retraction, and instrument triangulation, improving visualization and access to the target tissue for safer and more effective en bloc endoscopic submucosal and submuscular dissection. The learning curve for ESD was markedly facilitated by this new endoscopic platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.