ArticleHeart & lung : the journal of critical care
Gender differences in appraisal of stress and coping 5 years after heart transplantation.
Article in Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adherence to immunosuppression in adult heart transplant recipients: A systematic review.Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.) · 2021Pooled it
- Immunosuppressant adherence after heart transplantation: a review on detection, prevention, and intervention strategies in a multidisciplinary.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Resilience, Post-Traumatic Growth, and Transplant Effects-Gender Differences Following Liver Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A prospective study of cancer-related benefit finding in uveal melanoma patients.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Symptom Occurrence and Distress after Heart Transplantation-A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe examined whether gender differences exist regarding stress, symptom distress, coping, adherence, and social support 5 years after heart transplantation.
backgroundDifferences exist in health-related quality of life outcomes by gender after heart transplantation; women report poorer outcomes.
methodsPatients (n = 210, female = 42), were from a prospective, multi-site, study of health-related quality of life long-term after heart transplantation. Patients completed self-report instruments 5 years after heart transplantation (mean = 4.98 ± 0.17 years after transplant). Statistical analyses included two-sample t-tests, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, and multivariable modeling.
resultsWomen did not report more overall stress or symptom distress, but reported more difficulty adhering to the transplant regimen, yet more actual adherence than men. Women reported using more negative coping styles, but reported more satisfaction with social support.
conclusionsGender differences exist regarding appraisal of stress, coping styles, and coping resources long-term after heart transplantation. These differences may guide tailoring therapy regarding stress, poor coping, and lack of resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.