ArticlePloS one2015
Socio-Economic Differences in Cardiovascular Health: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study in a Middle-Income Country.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The social determinants of ideal cardiovascular health: A global systematic review.Annals of epidemiology · 2022Pooled it
- Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in ideal cardiovascular health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Association Between Socio-Economic Status (SES) and the Traditional Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD): A Cross-Sectional MASHAD Cohort Study Results.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Associations between education and ideal cardiovascular health metrics across 36 low- and middle-income countries.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Interventions to tackle health inequalities in cardiovascular risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a rapid review.British medical bulletin · 2023Review
- Association of Income Level and Ischemic Heart Disease: Potential Role of Walkability.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Article
- Influence of the Social Environment on Ideal Cardiovascular Health.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Social Development Index.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Ideal Cardiovascular Health Index and Its Determinants in a Rural South African Population.Global heart · 2020Article
- Metrics of Ideal Cardiovascular Health are Unequally Distributed between Peruvian Men and Women: Analysis of a National Population-Based Survey in 2017.International journal of preventive medicine · 2020Article
- Effect of Physical Activity on Hospital Service Use and Expenditures of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Results from Dongfeng-Tongji Cohort Study in China.Current medical science · 2019Article
- Status of cardiovascular health in the Republic of Serbia: Results from the National Health Survey.PloS one · 2019Article
- Review
- Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Disease: an Update.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Association Between Living in Food Deserts and Cardiovascular Risk.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2017Article
- Early Retirement: A Meta-Analysis of Its Antecedent and Subsequent Correlates.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA relatively consistent body of literature, mainly from high-income countries, supports an inverse association between socio-economic status (SES) and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Data from low- and middle-income countries are scarce. This study explores SES differences in cardiovascular health (CVH) in the Republic of Srpska (RS), Bosnia and Herzegovina, a middle-income country.
methodsWe collected information on SES (education, employment status and household's relative economic status, i.e. household wealth) and the 7 ideal CVH components (smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, diet, blood pressure, total cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose) among 3601 participants 25 years of age and older, from the 2010 National Health Survey in the RS. Based on the sum of all 7 CVH components an overall CVH score (CVHS) was calculated ranging from 0 (all CVH components at poor levels) to 14 (all CVH components at ideal levels). To assess the differences between groups the chi-square test, t-test and ANOVA were used where appropriate. The association between SES and CVHS was analysed with multivariate linear regression analyses. The dependent variable was CVHS, while independent variables were educational level, employment status and wealth index.
resultsAccording to multiple linear regression analysis CVHS was independently associated with education attainment and employment status. Participants with higher educational attainment and those economically active had higher CVHS (b = 0.57; CI = 0.29-0.85 and b = 0.27; CI = 0.10-0.44 respectively) after adjustment for sex, age group, type of settlement, and marital status. We failed to find any statistically significant difference between the wealth index and CVHS.
conclusionThis study presents the novel information, since CVHS generated from the individual CVH components was not compared by socio-economic status till now. Our finding that the higher overall CVHS was independently associated with a higher education attainment and those economically active supports the importance of reducing socio-economic inequalities in CVH in RS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.