Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26513427›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic neuropathic pain in adults.

Christopher Eccleston, Leslie Hearn, Amanda C de C Williams

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04814992 (Pre-op CBT to Reduce the Risk for Development of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04814992 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pre-op CBT to Reduce the Risk for Development of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled54ConditionsChronic Post-Surgical PainArmsComputer-Assisted Preoperative CBT Intervention (PAINTrainer)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuropathic pain in burn patients - A common problem with little literature: A systematic review.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Psychological therapies for the prevention of migraine in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Insight into the Role of Psychological Factors in Oral Mucosa Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher EcclestonCentre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK, BA2 7AY.
Leslie Hearn
Amanda C de C Williams
Cochrane · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/89/29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuropathic pain is thought to arise from damage to the somatosensory nervous system. Its prevalence is increasing in line with many chronic disorders such as diabetes. All treatments have limited effectiveness. Given the evidence regarding psychological treatment for distress and disability in people with various chronic pain conditions, we were interested to investigate whether psychological treatments have any effects for those with chronic neuropathic pain.

objectivesTo assess the effects of psychological treatments on pain experience, disability, mood, and health-care use in adults with chronic neuropathic pain. SEARCH

methodsWe searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in any language in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, from database inception to March 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Full publications of RCTs on psychological interventions for neuropathic pain. Trials had to have lasted at least three months, had at least 20 participants in each arm at the end of treatment, and compared a psychological intervention with any active or inactive intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN

resultsTwo small studies (enrolling a total of 105 participants) met the inclusion criteria. One was a standard cognitive behavioural treatment (CBT) programme for 61 people with pain from spinal cord injury, followed up for three months, and compared with a waiting list. The other was weekly group psychotherapy for 44 people with burning mouth syndrome, compared with a daily placebo tablet. The overall risk of bias was high in both trials.The CBT study assessed participants for pain, disability, mood, and quality of life, with improvement in treatment and control groups. However, there was no more improvement in the treatment group than in the control for any outcome, either post-treatment or at follow-up. The group psychotherapy study only assessed pain, classifying participants by pain severity. There is a lack of evidence on the efficacy and safety of psychological interventions for people with neuropathic pain. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence of the efficacy and safety of psychological interventions for chronic neuropathic pain. The two available studies show no benefit of treatment over either waiting list or placebo control groups.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotherapy, GroupAdultChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26513427
PMCPMC6485637
OpenAlexW1853576970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.