Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26512688›Full record

ReviewViruses2015

Identifying Recent HIV Infections: From Serological Assays to Genomics.

Sikhulile Moyo, Eduan Wilkinson, Vladimir Novitsky, Alain Vandormael, Simani Gaseitsiwe, Max Essex, Susan Engelbrecht, Tulio de Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Case Report:Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent HIV infection testing algorithms.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sikhulile MoyoDivision of Medical Virology, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa. sikhulilemoyo@gmail.com.
Eduan WilkinsonAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, Doris Duke Medical Research Centre, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. ewilkinson83@gmail.com.
Vladimir NovitskyBotswana-Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Private Bag BO320, Gaborone, Botswana. vnovi@hsph.harvard.edu.
Alain VandormaelAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, Doris Duke Medical Research Centre, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. vando026@umn.edu.
Simani GaseitsiweBotswana-Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Private Bag BO320, Gaborone, Botswana. sgaseitsiwe@bhp.org.bw.
Max EssexBotswana-Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Private Bag BO320, Gaborone, Botswana. messex@hsph.harvard.edu.
Susan EngelbrechtDivision of Medical Virology, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa. susanen@sun.ac.za.
Tulio de OliveiraAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, Doris Duke Medical Research Centre, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. tdeoliveira@africacentre.ac.za.

Funding

Training in HIV Genomics, Treatment, and Cure Research in BotswanaD43TW009610 · FIC · THE BOTSWANA HARVARD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP · PI SHAHIN LOCKMAN, Joseph Moeketsi Makhema · 2013 to 2026
$4.4M
FIC NIH HHS 5D43TW009610FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009610Medical Research Council MRC-RFA-UFSP-01-2013/UKZN HIVEPIWellcome Trust 097410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we review serological and molecular based methods to identify HIV infection recency. The accurate identification of recent HIV infection continues to be an important research area and has implications for HIV prevention and treatment interventions. Longitudinal cohorts that follow HIV negative individuals over time are the current gold standard approach, but they are logistically challenging, time consuming and an expensive enterprise. Methods that utilize cross-sectional testing and biomarker information have become an affordable alternative to the longitudinal approach. These methods use well-characterized biological makers to differentiate between recent and established HIV infections. However, recent results have identified a number of limitations in serological based assays that are sensitive to the variability in immune responses modulated by HIV subtypes, viral load and antiretroviral therapy. Molecular methods that explore the dynamics between the timing of infection and viral evolution are now emerging as a promising approach. The combination of serological and molecular methods may provide a good solution to identify recent HIV infection in cross-sectional data. As part of this review, we present the advantages and limitations of serological and molecular based methods and their potential complementary role for the identification of HIV infection recency.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesSerologic Testsmolecular-based assaysrecent HIV infectionserology-based assaysviral diversity

Identifiers

PMID26512688
PMCPMC4632395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.