Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26512586›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2015

Dental Procedures and the Risk of Infective Endocarditis.

Pei-Chun Chen, Ying-Chang Tung, Patricia W Wu, Lung-Sheng Wu, Yu-Sheng Lin, Chee-Jen Chang, Suefang Kung, Pao-Hsien Chu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Infective endocarditis by HACEK: a review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022
    Review
  15. Infective endocarditis following invasive dental procedures: IDEA case-crossover study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pei-Chun ChenFrom the Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center (PCC, CJC); Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei (YCT, LSW, YSL, PHC); Department of Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (PWW); Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Dentistry, Division of Periodontology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and Cheers Dental Clinic, New Taipei, Taiwan (SK); Healthcare Center (PHC); and Heart Failure Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (PHC).
Ying-Chang Tung
Patricia W Wu
Lung-Sheng Wu
Yu-Sheng Lin
Chee-Jen Chang
Suefang Kung
Pao-Hsien Chu
Pinal Hispanic Council · USChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) is an uncommon but potentially devastating disease. Recently published data have revealed a significant increase in the incidence of IE following the restriction on indications for antibiotic prophylaxis as recommended by the revised guidelines. This study aims to reexamine the basic assumption behind the rationale of prophylaxis that dental procedures increase the risk of IE.Using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan, we retrospectively analyzed a total of 739 patients hospitalized for IE between 1999 and 2012. A case-crossover design was conducted to compare the odds of exposure to dental procedures within 3 months preceding hospitalization with that during matched control periods when no IE developed.In the unadjusted model, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.93 for tooth extraction (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.59), 1.64 for surgery (95% CI 0.61-4.42), 0.92 for dental scaling (95% CI 0.59-1.42), 1.69 for periodontal treatment (95% CI 0.88-3.21), and 1.29 for endodontic treatment (95% CI 0.72-2.31). The association between dental procedures and the risk of IE remained insignificant after adjustment for antibiotic use, indicating that dental procedures did not increase the risk of IE.Therefore, this result may argue against the conventional assumption on which the recommended prophylaxis for IE is based.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibiotic ProphylaxisCohort StudiesDental CareDental ScalingEndocarditisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26512586
PMCPMC4985400
OpenAlexW2325533002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.