Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26512104›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Robustness of sensory-evoked excitation is increased by inhibitory inputs to distal apical tuft dendrites.

Robert Egger, Arno C Schmitt, Damian J Wallace, Bert Sakmann, Marcel Oberlaender, Jason N D Kerr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reliable Sensory Processing in Mouse Visual Cortex through Cooperative Interactions between Somatostatin and Parvalbumin Interneurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Layer 3 Dynamically Coordinates Columnar Activity According to Spatial Context.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert EggerComputational Neuroanatomy Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Graduate School of Neural Information Processing, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany;
Arno C SchmittNetwork Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
Damian J WallaceNetwork Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Department of Behavior and Brain Organization, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, 53175 Bonn, Germany;
Bert SakmannDigital Neuroanatomy, Max Planck Florida Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458 marcel.oberlaender@tuebingen.mpg.de bert.sakmann@mpfi.org.
Marcel OberlaenderComputational Neuroanatomy Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Digital Neuroanatomy, Max Planck Florida Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458 marcel.oberlaender@tuebingen.mpg.de bert.sakmann@mpfi.org.
Jason N D KerrNetwork Imaging Group, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Department of Behavior and Brain Organization, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, 53175 Bonn, Germany;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical inhibitory interneurons (INs) are subdivided into a variety of morphologically and functionally specialized cell types. How the respective specific properties translate into mechanisms that regulate sensory-evoked responses of pyramidal neurons (PNs) remains unknown. Here, we investigated how INs located in cortical layer 1 (L1) of rat barrel cortex affect whisker-evoked responses of L2 PNs. To do so we combined in vivo electrophysiology and morphological reconstructions with computational modeling. We show that whisker-evoked membrane depolarization in L2 PNs arises from highly specialized spatiotemporal synaptic input patterns. Temporally L1 INs and L2-5 PNs provide near synchronous synaptic input. Spatially synaptic contacts from L1 INs target distal apical tuft dendrites, whereas PNs primarily innervate basal and proximal apical dendrites. Simulations of such constrained synaptic input patterns predicted that inactivation of L1 INs increases trial-to-trial variability of whisker-evoked responses in L2 PNs. The in silico predictions were confirmed in vivo by L1-specific pharmacological manipulations. We present a mechanism-consistent with the theory of distal dendritic shunting-that can regulate the robustness of sensory-evoked responses in PNs without affecting response amplitude or latency.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsCerebral CortexComputer SimulationDendritesEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryInterneuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPyramidal CellsRatsSynaptic TransmissionVibrissaebarrel cortexcortical columnlayer 1NMDARshunting

Identifiers

PMID26512104
PMCPMC4653195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.