ReviewBriefings in functional genomics2016
Building a KATalogue of acetyllysine targeting and function.
Review in Briefings in functional genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A genetic interaction between DED1 and HAT1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a role for Hat1p in cytoplasmic RNA granule accumulation.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Sirtuin E deacetylase is required for full virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Genes and Longevity of Lifespan.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Functional networks of the human bromodomain-containing proteins.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Post-translational changes inFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Transcription shapes genome-wide histone acetylation patterns.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Lysine acetylation as drug target in fungi: an underexplored potential in Aspergillus spp.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020Review
- Integrated Analysis of the Functions and Prognostic Values of RNA-Binding Proteins in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- A synthetic non-histone substrate to study substrate targeting by the Gcn5 HAT and sirtuin HDACs.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- NuA4 Lysine Acetyltransferase Complex Contributes to Phospholipid Homeostasis inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Nicotinamide Suppresses the DNA Damage Sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Independently of Sirtuin Deacetylases.Genetics · 2016Article
- Mechanisms of Nucleosome Dynamics In Vivo.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016Review
- And then there were two.eLife · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acetylation is a dynamic post-translational modification that is attached to protein substrates by lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) and removed by lysine deacetylases (KDACs). While these enzymes are best characterized as histone modifiers and regulators of gene transcription, work in a number of systems highlights that acetylation is a pervasive modification and suggests a broad scope for KAT and KDAC functions in the cell. As we move beyond generating lists of acetylated proteins, the acetylation field is in dire need of robust tools to connect acetylation and deacetylation machineries to their respective substrates and to dissect the function of individual sites. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system provides such a toolkit in the context of both tried and true genetic techniques and cutting-edge proteomic and cell imaging methods. Here, we review these methods in the context of their contributions to acetylation research thus far and suggest strategies for addressing lingering questions in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.