Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511860›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2016

Biodistribution and Toxicity of X-Ray Iodinated Contrast Agent in Nano-emulsions in Function of Their Size.

Mohamed F Attia, Nicolas Anton, Roman Akasov, Manuela Chiper, Elena Markvicheva, Thierry F Vandamme

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed F AttiaUniversity of Strasbourg, Faculty of Pharmacy, 74 route du Rhin, 67401, Illkirch Cedex, France.
Nicolas AntonUniversity of Strasbourg, Faculty of Pharmacy, 74 route du Rhin, 67401, Illkirch Cedex, France. nanton@unistra.fr.
Roman AkasovUniversity of Strasbourg, Faculty of Pharmacy, 74 route du Rhin, 67401, Illkirch Cedex, France.
Manuela ChiperUniversity of Strasbourg, Faculty of Pharmacy, 74 route du Rhin, 67401, Illkirch Cedex, France.
Elena MarkvichevaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16/10, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Thierry F VandammeUniversity of Strasbourg, Faculty of Pharmacy, 74 route du Rhin, 67401, Illkirch Cedex, France.
Université de Strasbourg · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RULaboratoire de Chémo-biologie synthétique et thérapeutique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the impact of the size of X-ray iodinated contrast agent in nano-emulsions, on their toxicity and fate in vivo.

methodsA new compound, triiodobenzoate cholecalciferol, was synthetized, formulated as nano-emulsions, and followed after i.v. administration in mice by X-ray imaging (micro computed tomography). Physicochemical characterization and process optimization allowed identifying a good compromise between X-ray contrasting properties, monodispersity and stability. This also allowed selecting two formulations with different sizes, hydrodynamic diameters of 55 and 100 nm, but exactly the same composition. In vitro experiments were performed on two cell lines, namely hepatocytes (BNL-CL2) and macrophages (RAW264.7).

resultsCell viability studies, cell uptake observations by confocal microscopy, and uptake quantification by fluorimetry, disclosed clear differences between two formulations, as well as between two types of cell lines. After i.v. injection of the two iodinated nano-emulsions in mice, CT scans provided the quantification of the pharmacokinetics and biodistributions. We finally showed that the size in the nano-emulsions has not a real impact on the pharmacokinetics and biodistributions, but has a strong influence on their toxicity, corroborating the in vitro results.

conclusionsThis study shows that the size of the nanocarrier significantly matters, likely due to highly different interactions with cells and tissues. Graphical Abstract A study on the effect of the size of cholecciferol nano-emulsions, on their in vivo becoming, through X-ray imaging modality.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCell SurvivalChemistry, PharmaceuticalCholecalciferolContrast MediaEmulsionsHepatocytesIodineMacrophagesMiceNanoparticlesTissue DistributionTriiodobenzoic AcidsX-Ray MicrotomographyX-RaysCholecalciferolContrast MediaEmulsionsIodineTriiodobenzoic Acidscholecalciferolcontrast agentemulsion sizemicro-CTnano-emulsion

Identifiers

PMID26511860
OpenAlexW2203712873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.