Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511839›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

Differential outcome of an antimicrobial stewardship audit and feedback program in two intensive care units: a controlled interrupted time series study.

Linda R Taggart, Elizabeth Leung, Matthew P Muller, Larissa M Matukas, Nick Daneman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Value of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs [ASPs]: a systematic review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Handshake antimicrobial stewardship for adult surgical patients.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characteristics ofAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mixed methods evaluation of handshake antimicrobial stewardship on adult inpatient medicine floors.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In-Hospital Macro-, Meso-, and Micro-Drivers and Interventions for Antibiotic Use and Resistance: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis of Data from Canada and Other OECD Countries.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Impact of an antibiotic stewardship programme in a surgical setting.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda R TaggartDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. taggartl@smh.ca.
Elizabeth LeungDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. leungeli@smh.ca.
Matthew P MullerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. mullerm@smh.ca.
Larissa M MatukasDivision of Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. matukasl@smh.ca.
Nick DanemanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. nick.daneman@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial decision making in intensive care units (ICUs) is challenging. Unnecessary antimicrobials contribute to the development of resistant pathogens, Clostridium difficile infection and drug related adverse events. However, inadequate antimicrobial therapy is associated with mortality in critically ill patients. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are increasingly being implemented to improve antimicrobial prescribing, but the optimal approach in the ICU setting is unknown. We assessed the impact of an audit and feedback antimicrobial stewardship intervention on antimicrobial use, antimicrobial costs, clinical outcomes and microbiologic outcomes in two ICUs with different patient populations.

methodsThe audit and feedback intervention was implemented in a trauma and neurosurgery ICU (TNICU) and a medical surgical ICU (MSICU) at a 465-bed teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. ICU patients were reviewed Monday to Friday by a physician and pharmacist with infectious diseases training. Recommendations related to appropriate antimicrobial use were presented to ICU teams during a dedicated daily meeting. A controlled interrupted time series analysis was used to compare outcomes in the 12 months before and after the intervention. Cardiovascular and coronary care ICUs served as control units.

resultsMean total monthly antimicrobial use in defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 patient days was reduced 28% in the TNICU (1433 vs. 1037) but increased 14% in the MSICU (1705 vs. 1936). In the time series analysis, total monthly antimicrobial use in the TNICU decreased by 375 DDD per 1000 patient days (p < 0.0009) immediately following the intervention, followed by a non-significant downward trend in use of -9 DDD per 1000 patient days (p = 0.56). No significant changes in antimicrobial use were identified in the MSICU. Antimicrobial use temporarily increased in one control unit and remained unchanged in the other. There were no changes in mortality, length of stay, readmission rate, incidence of C. difficile infection or resistance patterns of E. coli and P. aeruginosa in either intervention unit.

conclusionsAudit and feedback antimicrobial stewardship programs can lead to significant reductions in total antimicrobial use in the ICU setting. However, this effect may be context-dependent and further work is needed to determine the ingredients necessary for success.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCanadaClostridium InfectionsCritical IllnessEscherichia coliFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPseudomonas aeruginosaTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID26511839
PMCPMC4625716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.