Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511805›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2016

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Younak Choi, Do-Youn Oh, Kyubo Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Tae-Yong Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Sae-Won Han, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Sung Whan Ha and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Younak ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Do-Youn OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyubo KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Eui Kyu ChieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Tae-Yong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung-Hun LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sae-Won HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seock-Ah ImDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Tae-You KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Whan HaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yung-Jue BangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), particularly the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), remains debatable. We compared the clinical outcomes of CCRT and palliative chemotherapy alone (CA) in patients with unresectable LAPC. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with LAPC who were consecutively treated between 2003 and 2010 were included. Resectability was evaluated according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network ver. 1.2012. The clinical outcomes for each treatment group (CCRT vs. CA) were evaluated retrospectively.

resultsSixty-three patients (58.9%) and 44 patients (41.1%) were treated with CCRT and CA, respectively. The CCRT cohort included patients who were treated with CCRT with or without chemotherapy backbone (CCRT alone, induction chemotherapy-CCRT, CCRT-maintenance chemotherapy, and induction-CCRT-maintenance chemotherapy). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 7.2 months and 13.1 months. PFS of the CCRT and CA groups was 9.0 months and 4.4 months, respectively (p=0.020). OS of the CCRT and CA groups was 15.4 months and 9.3 months, respectively (p=0.011). In multivariate analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio of CCRT was 0.536 (p=0.003) for OS and 0.667 (p=0.078) for PFS. Although the pattern of failure was similar in the CCRT and CA groups, the times to both local and distant failure were significantly longer in the CCRT group.

conclusionIn patients with unresectable LAPC, those who underwent CCRT during their entire treatment courses had longer OS than patients treated with chemotherapy alone.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInduction ChemotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsChemoradiotherapyPancreatic neoplasmsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26511805
PMCPMC4946358
OpenAlexW2151461364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.