Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511714›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2015

Throat and nasal swabs for molecular detection of respiratory viruses in acute pharyngitis.

Mohsin Ali, Sangsu Han, Chris J Gunst, Steve Lim, Kathy Luinstra, Marek Smieja

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamics of the Upper Respiratory Tract Microbiota and Its Association with Mortality in COVID-19.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Micro and Nanoscale Technologies for Diagnosis of Viral Infections.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohsin AliIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. mohsin.ali@icahn.mssm.edu.
Sangsu HanFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. shan037@uottawa.ca.
Chris J GunstDepartment of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. chris.gunst@mail.utoronto.ca.
Steve LimFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. stevee.lim@mail.utoronto.ca.
Kathy LuinstraSt. Joseph's Healthcare, St. Luke's Wing, L-424, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 4A6. kluinstr@stjosham.on.ca.
Marek SmiejaSt. Joseph's Healthcare, St. Luke's Wing, L-424, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 4A6. smiejam@mcmaster.ca.
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of specific respiratory viruses is important for surveillance programs, where nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs have traditionally been used. Our objective was to determine whether sampling with a throat swab provides incremental benefit-when used in conjunction with a nasal swab-to detect respiratory viruses among patients with acute pharyngitis in the outpatient setting.

findingsAmong 83 university students with acute pharyngitis, we detected respiratory viruses with molecular assays on two samples collected per student: with a flocked nasal mid-turbinate swab and a rayon throat swab. Forty-eight (58 %) patients had virus-positive samples, with 49 virus positives detected by either swab (one patient had a dual viral co-infection). The most common viruses were rhinovirus, coronavirus, and influenza A virus. Specifically, 29 virus positives were detected by both swabs, 14 exclusively by the nasal swab, and six exclusively by the throat swab. The additional six virus positives detected by the throat swab corresponded to an absolute increase in viral detection of 7.1 % (95 % CI: 1.2-12.9 %); the specific viruses detected were four rhinoviruses and two coronaviruses.

conclusionsThe flocked nasal swab samples respiratory viruses well, even among patients whose primary complaint is a sore throat. The rayon throat swab has modest incremental value over and above using the flocked nasal mid-turbinate swab alone, which suggests that while throat swabs alone would not be adequate for respiratory viral surveillance, they may have value as a supplementary test.

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHumansMaleNasal CavityOutpatientsPharyngitisPharynxSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingStudentsVirus DiseasesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26511714
PMCPMC4625558
OpenAlexW1957069376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.