Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511639›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2016

Deviation between self-reported and measured occupational physical activity levels in office employees: effects of age and body composition.

Katharina Wick, Oliver Faude, Susanne Schwager, Lukas Zahner, Lars Donath

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association between morning symptoms and physical activity in COPD: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina WickInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Stoystr. 3, 07740, Jena, Germany. katharina.wick@med.uni-jena.de.
Oliver FaudeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Susanne SchwagerInstitute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Stoystr. 3, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Lukas ZahnerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Lars DonathDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhether occupational physical activity (PA) will be assessed via questionnaires or accelerometry depends on available resources. Although self-reported data collection seems feasible and inexpensive, obtained information could be biased by demographic determinants. Thus, we aimed at comparing self-reported and objectively measured occupational sitting, standing, and walking times adjusted for socio-demographic variables.

methodsThirty-eight office employees (eight males, 30 females, age 40.8 ± 11.4 years, BMI 23.9 ± 4.2 kg/m(2)) supplied with height-adjustable working desks were asked to report sitting, standing, and walking times using the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire during one working week. The ActiGraph wGT3X-BT was used to objectively measure occupational PA during the same week. Subjectively and objectively measured data were compared computing the intra-class correlation coefficients, paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots. Furthermore, repeated-measurement ANOVAs for measurement (subjective vs. objective) and socio-demographic variables were calculated.

resultsSelf-reported data yielded a significant underestimation of standing time (13.3 vs. 17.9%) and an overestimation of walking time (12.7 vs. 5.0%). Significant interaction effects of age and measurement of standing time (F = 6.0, p = .02, ηp(2) = .14) and BMI group and measurement of walking time were found (F = 3.7, p = .04, ηp(2) = .17). Older employees (>39 years) underestimated their standing time, while underweight workers (BMI < 20 kg/m(2)) overestimated their walking time.

conclusionsSelf-reported PA data differ from objective data. Demographic variables (age, BMI) affect the amount of self-reported misjudging of PA. In order to improve the validity of self-reported data, a correction formula for the economic assessment of PA by subjective measures is needed, considering age and BMI.

Indexed as

AccelerometryPostureSelf ReportWalkingAdultAge FactorsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsWorkplaceActivityBiasComparisonObjective measuresQuestionnaireSedentarismSelf-reported dataSit–stand deskValidity

Identifiers

PMID26511639
OpenAlexW1916426489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.