Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511500›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2015

Oviposition but Not Sex Allocation Is Associated with Transcriptomic Changes in Females of the Parasitoid Wasp Nasonia vitripennis.

Nicola Cook, Urmi Trivedi, Bart A Pannebakker, Mark Blaxter, Michael G Ritchie, Eran Tauber, Tanya Sneddon, David M Shuker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Next-generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola CookSchool of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9TH, United Kingdom nc52@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Urmi TrivediEdinburgh Genomics and Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.
Bart A PannebakkerLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mark BlaxterEdinburgh Genomics and Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.
Michael G RitchieSchool of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.
Eran TauberDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Tanya SneddonSchool of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.
David M ShukerSchool of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.
University of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004243/1Medical Research Council G0900740Medical Research Council MR/K001744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking the evolution of the phenotype to the underlying genotype is a key aim of evolutionary genetics and is crucial to our understanding of how natural selection shapes a trait. Here, we consider the genetic basis of sex allocation behavior in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis using a transcriptomics approach. Females allocate offspring sex in line with the local mate competition (LMC) theory. Female-biased sex ratios are produced when one or a few females lay eggs on a patch. As the number of females contributing offspring to a patch increases, less female-biased sex ratios are favored. We contrasted the transcriptomic responses of females as they oviposit under conditions known to influence sex allocation: foundress number (a social cue) and the state of the host (parasitized or not). We found that when females encounter other females on a patch or assess host quality with their ovipositors, the resulting changes in sex allocation is not associated with significant changes in whole-body gene expression. We also found that the gene expression changes produced by females as they facultatively allocate sex in response to a host cue and a social cue are very closely correlated. We expanded the list of candidate genes associated with oviposition behavior in Nasonia, some of which may be involved in fundamental processes underlying the ability to facultatively allocate sex, including sperm storage and utilization.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscriptomeAnimalsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMolecular Sequence AnnotationOvipositionSexual Behavior, AnimalWaspsbehaviorgene expressionlocal mate competitionsex allocationtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID26511500
PMCPMC4683659
OpenAlexW1847365332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.