Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511446›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Peak shape clustering reveals biological insights.

Marzia A Cremona, Laura M Sangalli, Simone Vantini, Gaetano I Dellino, Pier Giuseppe Pelicci, Piercesare Secchi, Laura Riva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional data analysis for computational biology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marzia A CremonaMOX - Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. marziaangela.cremona@polimi.it.
Laura M SangalliMOX - Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. laura.sangalli@polimi.it.
Simone VantiniMOX - Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. simone.vantini@polimi.it.
Gaetano I DellinoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. gaetano.dellino@ieo.eu.
Pier Giuseppe PelicciDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. piergiuseppe.pelicci@ieo.eu.
Piercesare SecchiMOX - Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. piercesare.secchi@polimi.it.
Laura RivaCenter for Genomic Science of IIT@SEMM, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Milan, Italy. laura.riva@iit.it.
Politecnico di Milano · ITUniversity of Milan · ITItalian Institute of Technology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChIP-seq experiments are widely used to detect and study DNA-protein interactions, such as transcription factor binding and chromatin modifications. However, downstream analysis of ChIP-seq data is currently restricted to the evaluation of signal intensity and the detection of enriched regions (peaks) in the genome. Other features of peak shape are almost always neglected, despite the remarkable differences shown by ChIP-seq for different proteins, as well as by distinct regions in a single experiment.

resultsWe hypothesize that statistically significant differences in peak shape might have a functional role and a biological meaning. Thus, we design five indices able to summarize peak shapes and we employ multivariate clustering techniques to divide peaks into groups according to both their complexity and the intensity of their coverage function. In addition, our novel analysis pipeline employs a range of statistical and bioinformatics techniques to relate the obtained peak shapes to several independent genomic datasets, including other genome-wide protein-DNA maps and gene expression experiments. To clarify the meaning of peak shape, we apply our methodology to the study of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 in K562 cell line and in megakaryocytes.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that ChIP-seq profiles include information regarding the binding of other proteins beside the one used for precipitation. In particular, peak shape provides new insights into cooperative transcriptional regulation and is correlated to gene expression.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyChromatin ImmunoprecipitationCluster AnalysisDNAGATA1 Transcription FactorGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansK562 CellsMegakaryocytesProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNADNAGATA1 protein, humanGATA1 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID26511446
PMCPMC4625869
OpenAlexW2125248983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.