ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2015
Hemodialysis with end-stage renal disease did not raise the risk of intracranial hemorrhage after a head injury.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemodialysis (HD) treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (HD(+ESRD)) may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after a head injury (HI) for which heparin is used. However, the results of noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) in such patients are not always clear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of HD on the risk of ICH in ESRD patients and in controls without ESRD with HD (HD(-ESRD)), and to determine whether to lower the threshold of head CT in HD(+ESRD) patients after HI.
methodsIn this nationwide population-based study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we enrolled 6938 HD(+ESRD) HI patients for the case group and 13,876 randomly selected HD(-ESRD) HI patients for the control group. Measures of the post-HI association between HD(+ESRD) and ICH determined using conditional logistic regression.
resultsFive hundred sixty-eight (2.74 %) patients had post-HI ICH: 185 in the HD(+ESRD) group (2.67 % of cases) and 383 were from the HD(-ESRD) group (2.76 % of controls). Conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, stroke, cancer, and liver disease, HD(+ESRD) patients had no higher odds of ICH (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.91; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.11) than did HD(-ESRD) patients. In the subgroup analysis of immediate ICH, HD(+ESRD) patients had lower odds than did HD(-ESRD) patients (AOR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.56-0.94).
conclusionsHD(+ESRD) did not increase the post-HI risk of ICH. Therefore, it may not be necessary to lower the threshold of head CT in HD(+ESRD) patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.