Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511347›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

Determining intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) in inmates from Kajang Prison, Selangor, Malaysia for improved prison management.

Lorainne Angal, Rohela Mahmud, Sajideh Samin, Nan-Jiun Yap, Romano Ngui, Amirah Amir, Init Ithoi, Adeeba Kamarulzaman, Yvonne A L Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Epidemiology of HumanTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  17. The Coexistence ofBiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorainne AngalDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. laura89anne@gmail.com.
Rohela MahmudDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. rohela@um.edu.my.
Sajideh SaminPenjara Utama Kajang, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia. sajideh@prison.gov.my.
Nan-Jiun YapDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ynj1203@gmail.com.
Romano NguiDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. romano@um.edu.my.
Amirah AmirDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. amirahamir@um.edu.my.
Init IthoiDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. init@um.edu.my.
Adeeba KamarulzamanDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. adeeba@um.edu.my.
Yvonne A L LimDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. limailian@um.edu.my.
University of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prison management in Malaysia is proactively seeking to improve the health status of the prison inmates. Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are widely distributed throughout the world and are still gaining great concern due to their significant morbidity and mortality among infected humans. In Malaysia, there is a paucity of information on IPIs among prison inmates. In order to further enhance the current health strategies employed, the present study aims to establish firm data on the prevalence and diversity of IPIs among HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected individuals in a prison, an area in which informed knowledge is still very limited.

methodsSamples were subjected to microscopy examination and serological test (only for Strongyloides). Speciation for parasites on microscopy-positive samples and seropositive samples for Strongyloides were further determined via polymerase chain reaction. SPSS was used for statistical analysis.

resultsA total of 294 stool and blood samples each were successfully collected, involving 131 HIV positive and 163 HIV negative adult male inmates whose age ranged from 21 to 69-years-old. Overall prevalence showed 26.5% was positive for various IPIs. The IPIs detected included Blastocystis sp., Strongyloides stercoralis, Entamoeba spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., and Trichuris trichiura. Comparatively, the rate of IPIs was slightly higher among the HIV positive inmates (27.5%) than HIV negative inmates (25.8%). Interestingly, seropositivity for S. stercoralis was more predominant in HIV negative inmates (10.4%) compared to HIV-infected inmates (6.9%), however these findings were not statistically significant. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed the presence of Blastocystis, Strongyloides, Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar.

conclusionsThese data will enable the health care providers and prison management staff to understand the trend and epidemiological situations in HIV/parasitic co-infections in a prison. This information will further assist in providing evidence-based guidance to improve prevention, control and management strategies of IPIs co-infections among both HIV positive and HIV negative inmates in a prison environment.

Indexed as

PrisonersAdultAgedAnimalsBlastocystisCoinfectionEntamoeba histolyticaFecesHIV InfectionsHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionPrisons

Identifiers

PMID26511347
PMCPMC4625744
OpenAlexW1856461991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.