Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511293›Full record

ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2016

Reduced healthcare utilization following successful hepatitis C virus treatment in HIV-co-infected patients with mild liver disease.

P Padam, S Clark, W Irving, R Gellissen, E Thomson, J Main, G S Cooke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal timing of hepatitis C treatment among HIV/HCV coinfected ESRD patients: Pre- vs posttransplant.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

P PadamDivision of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.
S ClarkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.
W IrvingNIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Gastroenterology and the Liver, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
R GellissenDepartment of Hepatology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
E ThomsonMRC Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J MainDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
G S CookeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/1Medical Research Council MR/N005953/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have achieved high cure rates in many patient groups previously considered difficult-to-treat, including those HIV/HCV co-infected. The high price of these medications is likely to limit access to treatment, at least in the short term. Early treatment priority is likely to be given to those with advanced disease, but a more detailed understanding of the potential benefits in treating those with mild disease is needed. We hypothesized that successful HCV treatment within a co-infected population with mild liver disease would lead to a reduction in the use and costs of healthcare services in the 5 years following treatment completion. We performed a retrospective cohort study of HIV/HCV-co-infected patients without evidence of fibrosis/cirrhosis who received a course of HCV therapy between 2004 and 2013. Detailed analysis of healthcare utilization up to 5 years following treatment for each patient using clinical and electronic records was used to estimate healthcare costs. Sixty-three patients were investigated, of whom 48 of 63 (76.2%) achieved sustained virological response 12 weeks following completion of therapy (SVR12). Individuals achieving SVR12 incurred lower health utilization costs (£5,000 per-patient) compared to (£10 775 per-patient) non-SVR patients in the 5 years after treatment. Healthcare utilization rates and costs in the immediate 5 years following treatment were significantly higher in co-infected patients with mild disease that failed to achieve SVR12. These data suggest additional value to achieving cure beyond the prevention of complications of disease.

Indexed as

AdultAntiviral AgentsCohort StudiesCoinfectionDelivery of Health CareDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInterferon-alphaLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedAntiviral AgentsInterferon-alphapeginterferon alfa-2aPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsRibavirinhealthcare utilizationhepatitis CHIV

Identifiers

PMID26511293
PMCPMC4924594
OpenAlexW2146855464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.