Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26511050›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Inter-allelic interactions play a major role in microsatellite evolution.

William Amos, Danica Kosanović, Anders Eriksson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

William AmosDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK w.amos@zoo.cam.ac.uk.
Danica KosanovićDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Anders ErikssonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Amos Enterprise (China) · CNUniversity Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović · RSUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellite mutations identified in pedigrees confirm that most changes involve the gain or loss of single repeats. However, an unexpected pattern is revealed when the resulting data are plotted on standardized scales that range from the shortest to longest allele at a locus. Both mutation rate and mutation bias reveal a strong dependency on allele length relative to other alleles at the same locus. We show that models in which alleles mutate independently cannot explain these patterns. Instead, both mutation probability and direction appear to involve interactions between homologues in heterozygous individuals. Simple models in which the longer homologue in heterozygotes is more likely to mutate and/or biased towards contraction readily capture the observed trends. The exact model remains unclear in all its details but inter-allelic interactions are a vital component, implying a link between demographic history and the mode and tempo of microsatellite evolution.

Indexed as

AllelesEvolution, MolecularHeterozygoteMutationGenetics, PopulationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsMutation Rateallelic interactionsheterozygote instabilitymicrosatellitemutationmutation biasshort tandem repeat

Identifiers

PMID26511050
PMCPMC4650164
OpenAlexW1885698216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.