ArticleBMC genomics2015
VariantMetaCaller: automated fusion of variant calling pipelines for quantitative, precision-based filtering.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring pharmacogenetic factors influencing hydroxyurea response in tanzanian sickle cell disease patients: a genomic medicine approach.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Simple combination of multiple somatic variant callers to increase accuracy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Performance comparisons between clustering models for reconstructing NGS results from technical replicates.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Chromatin Velocity reveals epigenetic dynamics by single-cell profiling of heterochromatin and euchromatin.Nature biotechnology · 2022Article
- A whole genome sequencing approach to anterior cruciate ligament rupture-a twin study in two unrelated families.PloS one · 2022Article
- Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens.PloS one · 2022Article
- Genetic modifiers of long-term survival in sickle cell anemia.Clinical and translational medicine · 2020Article
- Identifying genetic variants and pathways associated with extreme levels of fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell disease in Tanzania.BMC medical genetics · 2020Article
- The impact of post-alignment processing procedures on whole-exome sequencing data.Genetics and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Article
- DNAscan: personal computer compatible NGS analysis, annotation and visualisation.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequencing pipelines to minimize false negative findings.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Overcoming challenges in variant calling: exploring sequence diversity in candidate genes for plant development in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne).DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2017Article
- Analysis of exome data for 4293 trios suggests GPI-anchor biogenesis defects are a rare cause of developmental disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017Article
- Review
- ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe low concordance between different variant calling methods still poses a challenge for the wide-spread application of next-generation sequencing in research and clinical practice. A wide range of variant annotations can be used for filtering call sets in order to improve the precision of the variant calls, but the choice of the appropriate filtering thresholds is not straightforward. Variant quality score recalibration provides an alternative solution to hard filtering, but it requires large-scale, genomic data.
resultsWe evaluated germline variant calling pipelines based on BWA and Bowtie 2 aligners in combination with GATK UnifiedGenotyper, GATK HaplotypeCaller, FreeBayes and SAMtools variant callers, using simulated and real benchmark sequencing data (NA12878 with Illumina Platinum Genomes). We argue that these pipelines are not merely discordant, but they extract complementary useful information. We introduce VariantMetaCaller to test the hypothesis that the automated fusion of measurement related information allows better performance than the recommended hard-filtering settings or recalibration and the fusion of the individual call sets without using annotations. VariantMetaCaller uses Support Vector Machines to combine multiple information sources generated by variant calling pipelines and estimates probabilities of variants. This novel method had significantly higher sensitivity and precision than the individual variant callers in all target region sizes, ranging from a few hundred kilobases to whole exomes. We also demonstrated that VariantMetaCaller supports a quantitative, precision based filtering of variants under wider conditions. Specifically, the computed probabilities of the variants can be used to order the variants, and for a given threshold, probabilities can be used to estimate precision. Precision then can be directly translated to the number of true called variants, or equivalently, to the number of false calls, which allows finding problem-specific balance between sensitivity and precision.
conclusionsVariantMetaCaller can be applied to small target regions and whole exomes as well, and it can be used in cases of organisms for which highly accurate variant call sets are not yet available, therefore it can be a viable alternative to hard filtering in cases where variant quality score recalibration cannot be used. VariantMetaCaller is freely available at http://bioinformatics.mit.bme.hu/VariantMetaCaller .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.