Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26510791›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Sec66-Dependent Regulation of Yeast Spindle-Pole Body Duplication Through Pom152.

Santharam S Katta, Jingjing Chen, Jennifer M Gardner, Jennifer M Friederichs, Sarah E Smith, Madelaine Gogol, Jay R Unruh, Brian D Slaughter, Sue L Jaspersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santharam S KattaStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Jingjing ChenStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Jennifer M GardnerStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Jennifer M FriederichsStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Sarah E SmithStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Madelaine GogolStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Jay R UnruhStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Brian D SlaughterStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Sue L JaspersenStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110 Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160 slj@stowers.org.
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In closed mitotic systems such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the nuclear envelope (NE) does not break down during mitosis, so microtubule-organizing centers such as the spindle-pole body (SPB) must be inserted into the NE to facilitate bipolar spindle formation and chromosome segregation. The mechanism of SPB insertion has been linked to NE insertion of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) through a series of genetic and physical interactions between NPCs and SPB components. To identify new genes involved in SPB duplication and NE insertion, we carried out genome-wide screens for suppressors of deletion alleles of SPB components, including Mps3 and Mps2. In addition to the nucleoporins POM152 and POM34, we found that elimination of SEC66/SEC71/KAR7 suppressed lethality of cells lacking MPS2 or MPS3. Sec66 is a nonessential subunit of the Sec63 complex that functions together with the Sec61 complex in import of proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Cells lacking Sec66 have reduced levels of Pom152 protein but not Pom34 or Ndc1, a shared component of the NPC and SPB. The fact that Sec66 but not other subunits of the ER translocon bypass deletion mutants in SPB genes suggests a specific role for Sec66 in the control of Pom152 levels. Based on the observation that sec66∆ does not affect the distribution of Ndc1 on the NE or Ndc1 binding to the SPB, we propose that Sec66-mediated regulation of Pom152 plays an NPC-independent role in the control of SPB duplication.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalMeiosisMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsMitosisNuclear EnvelopeNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpindle ApparatusSuppression, GeneticMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsMps3 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsPOM152 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSEC66 protein, S cerevisiaeMps3Nbp1Pom152Sec66/Sec71/Kar7spindle-pole body

Identifiers

PMID26510791
PMCPMC4676539
OpenAlexW2176127089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.