Observational studyAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2016
Entecavir safety and effectiveness in a national cohort of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in the US - the ENUMERATE study.
Observational study in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adverse events of nucleos(t)ide analogues for chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review.Journal of gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- One hundred and ninety-two weeks treatment of entecavir maleate for Chinese chronic hepatitis B predominantly genotyped B or C.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Trial
- Possible drug-drug interactions among elderly patients receiving antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B.Croatian medical journal · 2024Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: The Multicenter Hepatocellular Carcinoma Early Detection Strategy (HEDS) Study.Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Past, present, and future of long-term treatment for hepatitis B virus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Perspectives on the Underlying Etiology of HCC and Its Effects on Treatment Outcomes.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Review
- Action Mechanisms and Scientific Rationale of Using Nasal Vaccine (HeberNasvac) for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Advances in Viral Hepatitis A-E.Advances in therapy · 2022Review
- Review
- Chronic hepatitis B: New potential therapeutic drugs target.World journal of virology · 2022Review
- Current Perspectives on Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy for the Long-Term Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2022Review
- Challenges in the discontinuation of chronic hepatitis B antiviral agents.World journal of hepatology · 2021Review
- APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients.Hepatology international · 2021Article
- Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with renal dysfunction: Pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Review
- Nucleos(t)ide analogue continuous therapy associated with reduced adverse outcomes of chronic hepatitis B.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020Article
- Finite nucleos(t)ide analog therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: an emerging paradigm shift.Hepatology international · 2019Review
- A case of entecavir-associated bullous fixed drug eruption and a review of literature.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019Review
- A Comparison Between Community and Academic Practices in the USA in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Entecavir: Results of the ENUMERATE Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Rationale and design of the Hepatocellular carcinoma Early Detection Strategy study: A multi-center longitudinal initiative of the National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network.Contemporary clinical trials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEntecavir (ETV) has been shown to be safe and efficacious in randomised controlled trials in highly selected patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
aimTo determine the safety and effectiveness of ETV in 'real-world' HBV patients in the United States (US).
methodsTreatment-naïve HBV patients ≥18 years old who received ETV for ≥12 months between 2005 and 2013 were included in a retrospective, cohort study. Rates of ALT normalisation, undetectable HBV DNA, HBeAg and HBsAg loss/seroconversion, adverse events (AE) and clinical outcomes were evaluated.
resultsOf 841 patients, 658 [65% male, 83% Asian; median age 47 years] met the inclusion criteria. 36% were HBeAg+ and 9.3% cirrhotic. 89% had abnormal ALT. Baseline median HBV DNA was 5.8 log 10 IU/mL. Median duration of ETV treatment was 4 years. Rates of ALT normalisation at 1, 3 and 5 years were 37.2%, 48.7% and 56.2% in HBeAg+ and 39.6%, 46.8% and 55.6% in HBeAg- patients. HBV DNA was undetectable at 1, 3 and 5 years in 34.6%, 64.7% and 84.6% in HBeAg+ patients, and 81.9%, 90.3% and 96.2% in HBeAg patients. Five-year cumulative probability of HBeAg loss and seroconversion was 46% and 33.7% and HBsAg loss was 4.6%. ETV was discontinued due to adverse events in 1.2% of patients. Hepatic decompensation occurred in 0.8%, liver cancer in 2.7% and death in 0.6%.
conclusionEntecavir treatment was safe in a large cohort of US patients, but ALT normalisation and hepatitis B virus DNA suppression rates were lower than previously reported in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.