Trial reportImplementation science : IS2015
A real-world stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular care.
Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00574808 (Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Preventive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Preventive Care (IDOCC) Through Outreach Facilitation
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines when treating cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Coaching on Process Outcomes in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Impact of Practice Facilitation in Primary Care on Chronic Disease Care Processes and Outcomes: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies for Non-communicable Disease Guidelines in Primary Health Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Are interventions to increase the uptake of screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC family practice · 2017Pooled it
- Intervention to Improve Psychosocial Care for People with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Trial
- A controlled trial of dissemination and implementation of a cardiovascular risk reduction strategy in small primary care practices.Health services research · 2020Trial
- Feasibility of an Electronic Health Tool to Promote Physical Activity in Primary Care: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Cardiovascular risk factor reduction by community health workers in rural India: A cluster randomized trial.American heart journal · 2019Trial
- Asthma dissemination around patient-centered treatments in North Carolina (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized control trial evaluating dissemination of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention for asthma management.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Attributes of High-Performing Small Practices in a Guideline Implementation: A Multiple-Case Study.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Protocol for a stepped wedge randomized controlled trial to optimize antibiotics prescription in Nepal.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Practice visitations in primary care to improve performance of cardiovascular risk management: an observational study.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Implementation Strategies Used by Facilitators to Improve Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2024Article
- The effect of audit and feedback and implementation support on guideline adherence and patient outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: a study protocol for an open-label cluster-randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPractice facilitation has been associated with meaningful improvements in disease prevention and quality of patient care. Using practice facilitation, the Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) project aimed to improve the delivery of evidence-based cardiovascular care in primary care practices across a large health region. Our goal was to evaluate IDOCC's impact on adherence to processes of care delivery.
methodsA pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial recruiting primary care providers in practices located in Eastern Ontario, Canada (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00574808). Participants were randomly assigned by region to one of three steps. Practice facilitators were intended to visit practices every 3-4 (year 1-intensive) or 6-12 weeks (year 2-sustainability) to support changes in practice behavior. The primary outcome was mean adherence to indicators of evidence-based care measured at the patient level. Adherence was assessed by chart review of a randomly selected cohort of 66 patients per practice in each pre-intervention year, as well as in year 1 and year 2 post-intervention.
resultsEighty-four practices (182 physicians) participated. On average, facilitators had 6.6 (min: 2, max: 11) face-to-face visits with practices in year 1 and 2.5 (min: 0 max: 10) visits in year 2. We collected chart data from 5292 patients. After adjustment for patient and provider characteristics, there was a 1.9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): -2.9 to -0.9 %) and 4.2 % (95 % CI: -5.7 to -2.6 %) absolute decrease in mean adherence from baseline to intensive and sustainability years, respectively.
conclusionsIDOCC did not improve adherence to best-practice guidelines. Our results showed a small statistically significant decrease in mean adherence of questionable clinical significance. Potential reasons for this result include implementation challenges, competing priorities in practices, a broad focus on multiple chronic disease indicators, and use of an overall index of adherence. These results contrast with findings from previously reported facilitation trials and highlight the complexities and challenges of translating research findings into clinical practice.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00574808.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.