Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26510421›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

The effect of cost-sharing in private health insurance on the utilization of health care services between private insurance purchasers and non-purchasers: a study of the Korean health panel survey (2008-2012).

Young Choi, Jae-Hyun Kim, Ki-Bong Yoo, Kyoung Hee Cho, Jae-Woo Choi, Tae Hoon Lee, Woorim Kim, Eun-Cheol Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Who Benefits from the Fixed Copayment of Medical and Pharmaceutical Expenditure among the Korean Elderly?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Young ChoiDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. choiyoung223@yuhs.ac.
Jae-Hyun KimDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. kjh0930@yuhs.ac.
Ki-Bong YooDepartment of Healthcare Management, Eulji University, Seongnam, Korea. kb53545@gmail.com.
Kyoung Hee ChoDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. khcho404@yuhs.ac.
Jae-Woo ChoiDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. jwchoi2695@yuhs.ac.
Tae Hoon LeeDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. lthblackpoto@yuhs.ac.
Woorim KimDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. woorimk@yuhs.ac.
Eun-Cheol ParkDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. ecpark@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KREulji University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrivate health insurance in South Korea mainly functions as supplementary and complementary health insurance that compensates for insufficient coverage by National Health Insurance. However, full private coverage of public sector cost-sharing led to the problem of encouraging moral hazard-induced utilization, resulting in a policy change that occurred in October 2009. At that time, the Korean government introduced a minimum cost-sharing policy for indemnity health insurance. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of cost-sharing in private health insurance on health care utilization.

methodsWe analyzed data collected from the Korean Health Panel Survey from October 2008 to December 2011. We restricted the two groups to 803 purchasers with indemnity health insurance and 7023 non-purchasers who did not obtain any private health insurance. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to evaluate the effect of the 2009 policy.

resultsAfter the policy change, the utilization of outpatient visits by purchasers gradually decreased more than non-purchasers (0.015 in 2009 [p = 0.758], -0.117 in 2010 [p < 0.016], and -0.140 in 2011 [p = 0.004]). However, utilization of inpatient services was not statistically significant. Notably, the magnitude of the cost-sharing effect in indemnity health insurance was stronger for those receiving medical aid. Among this group, utilization of outpatient services (after the policy change in 2009) decreased more so than non-purchasers. Patients with three or more chronic diseases have not changed their health care utilization.

conclusionsOur results implied meaningful lessons for decision-makers and future health insurance policies in Korea and other countries in terms of cost-sharing in medical care. When policy makers intend to implement the cost-sharing, a different copayment scheme is needed according to the socioeconomic status or disease severity.

Indexed as

Private SectorAdultCost SharingFemaleHealth PolicyHealth ServicesHealth SurveysHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID26510421
PMCPMC4624650
OpenAlexW1914876507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.